Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34675708›Full record

ArticleRisk management and healthcare policy2021

COVID-19 Pandemic: Effect on Confidence Levels of Portuguese Towards People of Different Professions.

Miguel Ricou, Tiago Pereira, Helena P Pereira, Ricardo Picoli, Sílvia Marina

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Risk management and healthcare policy, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
0.4field-weighted citation impact, top 31% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Miguel RicouDepartment of Community Medicine, Information and Decision in Health of the Faculty of Medicine of University of Porto, Porto, Portugal.
Tiago PereiraOrder of Portuguese Psychologists, Lisbon, Portugal.
Helena P PereiraDepartment of Community Medicine, Information and Decision in Health of the Faculty of Medicine of University of Porto, Porto, Portugal.
Ricardo PicoliFaculty of Philosophy, Science and Letters of Ribeirão Preto at University of Sao Paulo, Sao Paulo, Brazil.
Sílvia MarinaDepartment of Community Medicine, Information and Decision in Health of the Faculty of Medicine of University of Porto, Porto, Portugal.
Universidade do Porto · PTCentre for Health Technology and Services Research · PTPortuguese Army · PTUniversidade de São Paulo · BR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe COVID-19 pandemic is emerging in a world where science is highly developed. Nevertheless, science is not the only resource that people resort to when they have difficulties. In this pandemic context, some professions became more relevant, including front-line professionals, such as medical doctors and nurses, and those who may have an indirect role. The aim of this study is to understand whether there is a strengthening of people's confidence, in politicians, journalists, science-based activities, and in more mystical dimensions.

methodsA cross-sectional study was carried out to understand the levels of confidence of the Portuguese population in several professional groups, measured in two pandemic moments. Participants were recruited to participate in the study through online platforms. The sample was randomly collected from the Portuguese population. The sample was composed of 1455 Portuguese people with a mean age of 44 years, and 1080 were female.

resultsWe found high levels of confidence in medical doctors and nurses, as well as in other health professions, science, and education. We detected the opposite trend for politicians and journalists. Measured in two pandemic moments, we found confidence levels in these professionals were lower in September than in July with statistical significance differences [(politicians (t = 3.15, p = 0.00); journalists (t = 2.49, p = 0.01)].

conclusionIt is important to improve a joint action between politicians, journalists, health and science professionals to communicate measures to increase confidence from people. There is a need for the engagement of the population in the adoption of protective measures and contribute to easier control in pandemic situations.

Indexed as

confidence intervalCOVID-19cross-sectional studyprofessions

Identifiers

PMID34675708
PMCPMC8500488
OpenAlexW3203483138

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.