ReviewCancer management and research2021
Organ-Sparing Strategies in Muscle-Invasive Bladder Cancer.
Review in Cancer management and research, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed, 9 citations in OpenAlex.
- Survival analysis comparing bladder preservation techniques in octogenarians with muscle-invasive bladder cancer.Translational andrology and urology · 2025Article
- Impact of HER2 Expression on the Prognosis of Muscle-Invasive Bladder Cancer Patients Treated with Bladder-Preservation Comprehensive Therapy.Biological procedures online · 2025Article
- Short-term Outcome of RPVBT Combined with Chemotherapy for Patients with Single, < 3 cm, T2 Stage Bladder cancer.Biological procedures online · 2024Article
- Prospective evaluation of sexual health following radical cystectomy due to bladder cancer.Sexual medicine · 2024Article
- Review
- Conditional survival of trimodal therapy for nonmetastatic muscle-invasive bladder cancer: A SEER database analysis.Cancer medicine · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Radical cystectomy (RC) is the treatment of choice and is strongly recommended for patients with pT2-4aN0M0 bladder cancer in both the European Association of Urology (EAU) and American Urological Association (AUA) muscle-invasive bladder cancer (MIBC) guidelines. RC is a challenging operation, with significant perioperative and postoperative morbidity and mortality, having short-term complication rates between 14.4% and 21.7%, and long-term oncological survival rates ranging from 60% after 5 years to 43% after 10 years. The impact on quality of life (QoL) in patients after treatment for bladder cancer is significantly worse than in other pelvic cancers. Although RC is strongly recommended as the gold standard, there is a need for bladder-sparing options in MIBC. Attempts to improve mortality and morbidity rates after RC have been made by implementing Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS), robot-assisted RC, and sexual function-preserving techniques. None of these significantly improves QoL or functional outcome. Because of the invasiveness of RC, other therapeutic options have been evaluated. Transurethral resection of the bladder tumor (TURB) plays an important role in the diagnostic evaluation of MIBC and has also been reviewed as a curative option, although the oncological results appear inferior to RC. Furthermore, improved radiotherapy (RT) and widely used chemotherapy, both as monotherapeutic options in bladder cancer, are not as effective as radical surgery, with lower survival rates. Trimodality treatment (TMT) in bladder cancer combines TURB with chemotherapy and RT. The goal of TMT is preserving the bladder and QoL without compromising oncological outcome. A 2018 review showed no difference in overall survival rates between RC and TMT (30.9% vs 35.1%), with lower survival rates after RC than TMT in the first year of follow-up, probably due to higher postoperative mortality. For a selected group of patients, TMT is to be recommended, and it is the most favorable option out of the organ-sparing strategies in MIBC.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.