Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34675616›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of general medicine2021

Validation of the General Medicine in-Training Examination Using the Professional and Linguistic Assessments Board Examination Among Postgraduate Residents in Japan.

Kazuya Nagasaki, Yuji Nishizaki, Masanori Nojima, Taro Shimizu, Ryota Konishi, Tomoya Okubo, Yu Yamamoto, Ryo Morishima, Hiroyuki Kobayashi, Yasuharu Tokuda

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of general medicine, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 32 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
32citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

32 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Kazuya NagasakiDepartment of Internal Medicine, Mito Kyodo General Hospital, University of Tsukuba, Ibaraki, Japan.
Yuji NishizakiMedical Technology Innovation Center, Juntendo University, Tokyo, Japan.
Masanori NojimaCenter for Translational Research, The Institute of Medical Science, The University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan.
Taro ShimizuDepartment of Diagnostic and Generalist Medicine, Dokkyo Medical University Hospital, Tochigi, Japan.
Ryota KonishiEducation Adviser Japan Organization of Occupational Health and Safety, Kanagawa, Japan.ORCID 0000-0001-5538-1507
Tomoya OkuboResearch Division, The National Center for University Entrance Examinations, Tokyo, Japan.
Yu YamamotoDivision of General Medicine, Center for Community Medicine, Jichi Medical University School of Medicine, Tochigi, Japan.
Ryo MorishimaDepartment of Neurology, Tokyo Metropolitan Neurological Hospital, Tokyo, Japan.
Hiroyuki KobayashiDepartment of Internal Medicine, Mito Kyodo General Hospital, University of Tsukuba, Ibaraki, Japan.
Yasuharu TokudaMuribushi Okinawa for Teaching Hospitals, Okinawa, Japan.ORCID 0000-0002-9325-7934

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeIn Japan, the General Medicine In-training Examination (GM-ITE) was developed by a non-profit organization in 2012. The GM-ITE aimed to assess the general clinical knowledge among residents and to improve the training programs; however, it has not been sufficiently validated and is not used for high-stake decision-making. This study examined the association between GM-ITE and another test measure, the Professional and Linguistic Assessments Board (PLAB) 1 examination.

methodsNinety-seven residents who completed the GM-ITE in fiscal year 2019 were recruited and took the PLAB 1 examination in Japanese. The association between two tests was assessed using the Pearson product-moment statistics. The discrimination indexes were also assessed for each question.

resultsA total of 91 residents at 17 teaching hospitals were finally included in the analysis, of whom 69 (75.8%) were women and 59 (64.8%) were postgraduate second year residents. All the participants were affiliated with community hospitals. Positive correlations were demonstrated between the GM-ITE and the PLAB scores (

conclusionThis study demonstrates incremental validity evidence of the GM-ITE to assess the clinical knowledge acquisition. The results indicate that GM-ITE can be widely used to improve resident education in Japan.

Indexed as

extrapolationGeneral Medicine In-Training Examinationin-training examinationmedical knowledgepostgraduate medical educationProfessional and Linguistic Assessments Boardvalidity

Identifiers

PMID34675616
PMCPMC8504475

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.