Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34675604›Full record

ReviewInternational journal of nephrology and renovascular disease2021

Automated Peritoneal Dialysis: Patient Perspectives and Outcomes.

Alessandro Domenici, Anna Giuliani

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in International journal of nephrology and renovascular disease, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
1.6field-weighted citation impact, top 17% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 15 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Patient perspectives on peritoneal dialysis (PD) and the PD catheter: Strategies and Solutions.Peritoneal dialysis international : journal of the International Society for Peritoneal Dialysis · 2023
    Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Alessandro DomeniciDepartment of Clinical and Molecular Medicine, "Sapienza" University, Sant'Andrea Hospital, Nephrology and Dialysis Unit, Rome, Italy.
Anna GiulianiDepartment of Nephrology Dialysis and Transplantation, San Bortolo Hospital, Vicenza, Italy.
Azienda Ospedaliera Sant'Andrea · ITOspedale San Bortolo · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

A steadily increasing number of end stage kidney disease (ESKD) patients are maintained on automated peritoneal dialysis (APD) worldwide, in long-standing as well as in more recently established peritoneal dialysis (PD) programs. A better understanding of the technique, paralleled by progress in involved technology, sustained this growth to the point that APD has become the prevalent mode of PD delivery in most high-income countries. While APD is now regarded to be at least as efficient as continuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysis (CAPD) with regard to major biomedical outcomes, its impact on patient-reported outcomes has been less investigated. This paper reviews the main outcomes of APD from a clinical point of view and from the person on dialysis perspective.

Indexed as

cyclerintraperitoneal pressureprescriptionquality of lifetidalultrafiltration

Identifiers

PMID34675604
PMCPMC8504469
OpenAlexW3202461386

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.