ArticleClinical, cosmetic and investigational dermatology2021
Comparing the Efficacy of Chemical Cautery to Cryosurgery on CD4+ Status of HIV Patients with Condyloma Acuminata.
Article in Clinical, cosmetic and investigational dermatology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.
- Article
- Cryosurgery in oral lesions.Journal of clinical and experimental dentistry · 2025Review
- The Effectiveness of Chemical Cautery and Electrosurgery on Anogenital Wart: Systematic Review.Clinical, cosmetic and investigational dermatology · 2023Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionCondyloma acuminata (CA) is one of the sexually transmitted infections caused by human papillomavirus (HPV). Condyloma acuminata patients are usually coinfected with human immunodeficiency virus (HIV), particularly those with low CD4+ levels. Chemical cautery and cryosurgery are therapeutic modalities for CA, aiming to remove lesions and prevent recurrence, especially in patients with HIV.
objectiveTo compare the efficacy of chemical cautery to cryosurgery on CD4+ status of HIV patients with CA.
methodsA cross-sectional retrospective study was conducted in patients with CA visiting the Dermatology and Venereology outpatient clinic and the voluntary counseling and testing (VCT) clinic of Dr. Moewardi Hospital Surakarta, Indonesia from January 2018 to December 2020. The data were taken from the medical records of patients. These subjects were grouped into CA with HIV and without HIV. The data were statistically analyzed with
resultsSeventy-eight patients with CA were included in the study, comprising 41 subjects with HIV infection and 37 subjects without HIV infection. The subjects were predominantly male (68%). Of all the subjects, 70.5% received chemical cautery, and the remaining had cryosurgery. Multivariate regression tests obtained no significant differences in CD4+ levels between chemical cautery and cryosurgery (p=0.138 vs p=0.907).
conclusionEither chemical cautery or cryosurgery is effective in improving the clinical condition of patients with CA. Although chemical cautery results in a higher level of CD4+ than cryosurgery, statistically both therapies have no significant difference regarding CD4+ status.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.