Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34675504›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease

Quantifying the Economic Impact of Delayed Multiple-Inhaler Triple Therapy Initiation in Patients with COPD: A Retrospective Cohort Study of Linked Electronic Medical Record and Hospital Administrative Data in England.

Leah B Sansbury, Robert P Wood, Glenn A Anley, Yein Nam, Afisi S Ismaila

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
0.9field-weighted citation impact, top 24% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 9 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Prompt versus Delayed Triple Therapy in COPD: Solutions to Time-Related Biases in Observational Studies.International journal of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease · 2025
    Observational
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 4 institutions in 3 countries.

Leah B SansburyEpidemiology, Value Evidence and Outcomes, GlaxoSmithKline, Research Triangle Park, NC, USA.
Robert P WoodObservational Research, Adelphi Real World, Bollington, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-6977-435X
Glenn A AnleyUK Health Outcomes, GlaxoSmithKline, Uxbridge, UK.
Yein NamObservational Research, Adelphi Real World, Bollington, UK.
Afisi S IsmailaValue Evidence and Outcomes, GlaxoSmithKline, Collegeville, PA, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-2876-8308
Adelphi Group (United Kingdom) · GBGlaxoSmithKline (United Kingdom) · GBGlaxoSmithKline (United States) · USResearch Triangle Park Foundation · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeTo assess if early multiple-inhaler triple therapy (MITT) initiation in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) reduces subsequent healthcare resource utilization (HCRU), direct medical costs, and acute exacerbations of COPD (AECOPDs). PATIENTS AND

methodsThis retrospective, longitudinal cohort study used electronic health records and linked hospital administrative data in England. COPD patients with an AECOPD between July 2012 and May 2016 (index), and who subsequently started MITT within 180 days were eligible. Patients with an AECOPD 6 months prior to index were excluded. HCRU, direct healthcare costs, and AECOPDs were assessed in the following 24-month period for early (≤30 days) and delayed (31-180 days) MITT initiators.

resultsA total of 934 patients were included in the analysis and categorized as early (n=367, 39%) or delayed (n=567, 61%) MITT initiators. Mean patient age was 68.5 years and 53.2% were male. A significantly higher proportion of delayed MITT initiators required ≥1 outpatient appointment (all-cause) compared with early MITT initiators (87% vs 79%; p=0.0016). A significantly higher proportion of delayed MITT initiators required ≥1 COPD‑related inpatient stay versus early MITT initiators (47% vs 40%; p=0.0262). Over the 24-month follow-up, mean all-cause and COPD-related total healthcare costs were significantly higher in delayed MITT initiators compared with early MITT initiators (all‑cause: £11,348 vs £8126; p=0.0011; COPD-related: £7307 vs £4535; p=0.0009).

conclusionDelayed initiation of multiple-inhaler triple therapy was associated with higher all-cause and COPD-related costs, suggesting that earlier initiation of triple therapy in COPD patients may help reduce the economic burden on the healthcare system.

Indexed as

Electronic Health RecordsPulmonary Disease, Chronic ObstructiveAdministration, InhalationAdrenergic beta-2 Receptor AgonistsAgedBronchodilator AgentsCohort StudiesHospitalsHumansLongitudinal StudiesMaleMuscarinic AntagonistsNebulizers and VaporizersRetrospective StudiesAdrenergic beta-2 Receptor AgonistsBronchodilator AgentsMuscarinic Antagonistschronic obstructive pulmonary diseaseEnglandexacerbationhealthcare utilizationmultiple-inhaler triple therapytriple therapy

Identifiers

PMID34675504
PMCPMC8517427
OpenAlexW3203380990

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.