Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34675409›Full record

ArticleOncogene2022

Reduction in O-glycome induces differentially glycosylated CD44 to promote stemness and metastasis in pancreatic cancer.

Frank Leon, Parthasarathy Seshacharyulu, Rama K Nimmakayala, Seema Chugh, Saswati Karmakar, Palanisamy Nallasamy, Raghupathy Vengoji, Satyanarayana Rachagani, Jesse L Cox, Kavita Mallya and 2 more

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Oncogene, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 24 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
24citing papers in PubMed
3.4field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

24 citing papers in PubMed, 35 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Encoding Cell-Surface Receptor Function Through Glycosylation: Lessons From CD44.Chembiochem : a European journal of chemical biology · 2026
    Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Glycosylation in Cancer.Handbook of experimental pharmacology · 2025
    Review
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Frank LeonDepartment of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, University of Nebraska Medical Center, Omaha, NE, USA.
Parthasarathy SeshacharyuluDepartment of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, University of Nebraska Medical Center, Omaha, NE, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2348-3901
Rama K NimmakayalaDepartment of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, University of Nebraska Medical Center, Omaha, NE, USA.
Seema ChughDepartment of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, University of Nebraska Medical Center, Omaha, NE, USA.
Saswati KarmakarDepartment of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, University of Nebraska Medical Center, Omaha, NE, USA.
Palanisamy NallasamyDepartment of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, University of Nebraska Medical Center, Omaha, NE, USA.
Raghupathy VengojiDepartment of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, University of Nebraska Medical Center, Omaha, NE, USA.
Satyanarayana RachaganiDepartment of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, University of Nebraska Medical Center, Omaha, NE, USA.
Jesse L CoxDepartment of Pathology and Microbiology, University of Nebraska Medical Center, Omaha, NE, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4590-7381
Kavita MallyaDepartment of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, University of Nebraska Medical Center, Omaha, NE, USA.
Surinder K BatraDepartment of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, University of Nebraska Medical Center, Omaha, NE, USA. sbatra@unmc.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9470-9317
Moorthy P PonnusamyDepartment of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, University of Nebraska Medical Center, Omaha, NE, USA. mpalanim@unmc.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5744-193X
University of Nebraska Medical Center · USNebraska Medical Center · US

Funding

Pancreatic Cancer Detection ConsortiumU01CA210240 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF NEBRASKA MEDICAL CENTER · PI Michael A. Hollingsworth · 2017 to 2026
$12.9M
Validation of biomarkers for risk prediction and early diagnosis of Pancreatic AdenocarcinomaU01CA200466 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH AT PITTSBURGH · PI Surinder K. Batra, Randall Brand · 2016 to 2026
$11.3M
Project 3: MUC16-Mediated Metabolic Reprograming Induces PC MetastasisP01CA217798 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF NEBRASKA MEDICAL CENTER · PI HOLLINGSWORTH, MICHAEL A. · 2018 to 2022
$8.1M
Role of PD2/Paf1 in Pancreatic Acinar to Ductal MetaplasiaR01CA210637 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF NEBRASKA MEDICAL CENTER · PI BATRA, SURINDER K., PONNUSAMY, MOORTHY P. · 2017 to 2021
$2.0M
Rac1 GTPase in tumorigenesis and progression of pancreatic cancerR01CA206444 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF NEBRASKA MEDICAL CENTER · PI BATRA, SURINDER K., OUELLETTE, MICHEL M · 2016 to 2020
$1.9M
PD2/Paf1 and pancreatic cancer stem cellsK22CA175260 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF NEBRASKA MEDICAL CENTER · PI PONNUSAMY, MOORTHY P. · 2014 to 2016
$364k
NCI NIH HHS K22 CA175260NCI NIH HHS P01 CA217798NCI NIH HHS R01 CA206444NCI NIH HHS R01 CA210637NCI NIH HHS U01 CA200466NCI NIH HHS U01 CA210240
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Aberrant protein glycosylation has been shown to have a significant contribution in aggressive cancer, including pancreatic cancer (PC). Emerging evidence has implicated the involvement of cancer stem cells (CSCs) in PC aggressiveness; however, the contribution of glycosylation on self-renewal properties and maintenance of CSC is understudied. Here, using several in vitro and in vivo models lacking C1GALT1 expression, we identified the role of aberrant O-glycosylation in stemness properties and aggressive PC metastasis. A loss in C1GALT1 was found to result in the truncation of O-glycosylation on several glycoproteins with an enrichment of Tn carbohydrate antigen. Mapping of Tn-bearing glycoproteins in C1GALT1 KO cells identified significant Tn enrichment on CSC glycoprotein CD44. Notably, a loss of C1GALT1 in PC cells was found to enhance CSC features (side population-SP, ALDH1+, and tumorspheres) and self-renewal markers NANOG, SOX9, and KLF4. Furthermore, a loss of CD44 in existing C1GALT1 KO cells decreased NANOG expression and CSC features. We determined that O-glycosylation of CD44 activates ERK/NF-kB signaling, which results in increased NANOG expression in PC cells that facilitated the alteration of CSC features, suggesting that NANOG is essential for PC stemness. Finally, we identified that loss of C1GALT1 expression was found to augment tumorigenic and metastatic potential, while an additional loss of CD44 in these cells reversed the effects. Overall, our results identified that truncation of O-glycans on CD44 increases NANOG activation that mediates increased CSC activation.

Indexed as

Cell DifferentiationCell Line, TumorGlycosylationHumansHyaluronan ReceptorsNeoplasm MetastasisNeoplastic Stem CellsPancreatic NeoplasmsCD44 protein, humanHyaluronan Receptors

Identifiers

PMID34675409
PMCPMC8727507
OpenAlexW3205359523

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.