ArticleScientific reports2021
Water cavitation from ambient to high temperatures.
Article in Scientific reports, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
11 citing papers in PubMed.
- Hydrodynamical pathways in the phase change of real fluids.Communications physics · 2026Article
- Extending classical nucleation theory to consider curvature and real-gas effects.Ultrasonics sonochemistry · 2025Article
- Complex transition pathways in boiling and cavitation.Journal of fluid mechanics · 2025Article
- Onset of cavitation and vapor bubble development over hydrophilic and hydrophobic surfaces.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2025Article
- The diffuse interface description of fluid lipid membranes captures key features of the hemifusion pathway and lateral stress profile.PNAS nexus · 2024Article
- Exploring operational boundaries for acoustic concentration of cell suspensions.Applied microbiology and biotechnology · 2024Article
- Mesoscopic elasticity controls dynamin-driven fission of lipid tubules.Scientific reports · 2024Article
- Enhanced Performance of an Acoustofluidic Device by Integrating Temperature Control.Micromachines · 2024Article
- A nanoscale view of the origin of boiling and its dynamics.Nature communications · 2023Article
- Direct van der Waals simulation (DVS) of phase-transforming fluids.Science advances · 2023Article
- Activation energy and force fields during topological transitions of fluid lipid vesicles.Communications physics · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Predicting cavitation has proved a formidable task, particularly for water. Despite the experimental difficulty of controlling the sample purity, there is nowadays substantial consensus on the remarkable tensile strength of water, on the order of -120 MPa at ambient conditions. Recent progress significantly advanced our predictive capability which, however, still considerably depends on elaborate fitting procedures based on the input of external data. Here a self-contained model is discussed which is shown able to accurately reproduce cavitation data for water over the most extended range of temperatures for which accurate experiments are available. The computations are based on a diffuse interface model which, as only inputs, requires a reliable equation of state for the bulk free energy and the interfacial tension. A rare event technique, namely the string method, is used to evaluate the free-energy barrier as the base for determining the nucleation rate and the cavitation pressure. The data allow discussing the role of the Tolman length in determining the nucleation barrier, confirming that, when the size of the cavitation nuclei exceed the thickness of the interfacial layer, the Tolman correction effectively improves the predictions of the plain Classical Nucleation Theory.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.