Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34675229›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2021

Optimal value of CA19-9 determined by KRAS-mutated circulating tumor DNA contributes to the prediction of prognosis in pancreatic cancer patients.

Fumiaki Watanabe, Koichi Suzuki, Sawako Tamaki, Iku Abe, Yuhei Endo, Yuji Takayama, Hideki Ishikawa, Nao Kakizawa, Masaaki Saito, Kazushige Futsuhara and 3 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
0.5field-weighted citation impact, top 32% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Ratiometric electrochemical aptasensor based on functionalized graphene nanocomposites for detection of CA19-9.Analytical sciences : the international journal of the Japan Society for Analytical Chemistry · 2025
    Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Cancer genomics & proteomics
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Fumiaki WatanabeDepartment of Surgery, Saitama Medical Center, Jichi Medical University, 1-847, Amanuma-cho, Omiya-ku, Saitama, 330-8503, Japan.
Koichi SuzukiDepartment of Surgery, Saitama Medical Center, Jichi Medical University, 1-847, Amanuma-cho, Omiya-ku, Saitama, 330-8503, Japan. ksuzubnhm@yahoo.co.jp.
Sawako TamakiDepartment of Surgery, Saitama Medical Center, Jichi Medical University, 1-847, Amanuma-cho, Omiya-ku, Saitama, 330-8503, Japan.
Iku AbeDepartment of Surgery, Saitama Medical Center, Jichi Medical University, 1-847, Amanuma-cho, Omiya-ku, Saitama, 330-8503, Japan.
Yuhei EndoDepartment of Surgery, Saitama Medical Center, Jichi Medical University, 1-847, Amanuma-cho, Omiya-ku, Saitama, 330-8503, Japan.
Yuji TakayamaDepartment of Surgery, Saitama Medical Center, Jichi Medical University, 1-847, Amanuma-cho, Omiya-ku, Saitama, 330-8503, Japan.
Hideki IshikawaDepartment of Surgery, Saitama Medical Center, Jichi Medical University, 1-847, Amanuma-cho, Omiya-ku, Saitama, 330-8503, Japan.
Nao KakizawaDepartment of Surgery, Saitama Medical Center, Jichi Medical University, 1-847, Amanuma-cho, Omiya-ku, Saitama, 330-8503, Japan.
Masaaki SaitoDepartment of Surgery, Saitama Medical Center, Jichi Medical University, 1-847, Amanuma-cho, Omiya-ku, Saitama, 330-8503, Japan.
Kazushige FutsuharaDepartment of Surgery, Saitama Medical Center, Jichi Medical University, 1-847, Amanuma-cho, Omiya-ku, Saitama, 330-8503, Japan.
Hiroshi NodaDepartment of Surgery, Saitama Medical Center, Jichi Medical University, 1-847, Amanuma-cho, Omiya-ku, Saitama, 330-8503, Japan.
Fumio KonishiNerima Hikarigaoka Hospital, 2-11-1, Hikarigaoka, Nerima-ku, Tokyo, 179-0072, Japan.
Toshiki RikiyamaDepartment of Surgery, Saitama Medical Center, Jichi Medical University, 1-847, Amanuma-cho, Omiya-ku, Saitama, 330-8503, Japan.
Jichi Medical University · JPJichi Medical University Saitama Medical Center · JP

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Despite the acceptance of carbohydrate antigen 19-9 (CA19-9) as a valuable predictor for the prognosis of pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC), its cutoff value remains controversial. Our previous study showed a significant correlation between CA19-9 levels and the presence of KRAS-mutated ctDNA in the blood of patients with PDAC. Based on this correlation, we investigated the optimal cutoff value of CA19-9 before surgery. Continuous CA19-9 values and KRAS-mutated ctDNAs were monitored in 22 patients with unresectable PDAC who underwent chemotherapy between 2015 and 2017. Receiver operating characteristic curve analysis identified 949.7 U/mL of CA19-9 as the cutoff value corresponding to the presence of KRAS-mutated ctDNA. The median value of CA19-9 was 221.1 U/mL. Subsequently, these values were verified for their prognostic values of recurrence-free survival (RFS) and overall survival (OS) in 60 patients who underwent surgery between 2005 and 2013. Multivariate analysis revealed that 949.7 U/mL of CA19-9 was an independent risk factor for OS and RFS in these patients (P = 0.001 and P = 0.010, respectively), along with lymph node metastasis (P = 0.008 and P = 0.017), unlike the median CA19-9 level (P = 0.150 and P = 0.210). The optimal CA19-9 level contributes to the prediction of prognosis in patients with PDAC before surgery.

Indexed as

MutationAgedCA-19-9 AntigenCarcinoma, DuctalCirculating Tumor DNAFemaleHumansLymphatic MetastasisMaleNeoplasm Recurrence, LocalPancreatic NeoplasmsPrognosisProto-Oncogene Proteins p21(ras)Survival AnalysisCA-19-9 AntigenCirculating Tumor DNAKRAS protein, humanProto-Oncogene Proteins p21(ras)

Identifiers

PMID34675229
PMCPMC8531317
OpenAlexW3171508442

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.