Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34675189›Full record

Trial reportTranslational psychiatry2021

Methylphenidate modulates interactions of anxiety with cognition.

C Gaillard, T R Lago, A X Gorka, N L Balderston, B A Fuchs, R C Reynolds, C Grillon, M Ernst

Open access · goldAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Translational psychiatry, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
1.2field-weighted citation impact, top 23% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 15 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

C GaillardSection on Neurobiology of Fear and Anxiety, National Institute of Mental Health, Bethesda, MD, USA. claudie.gaillard@nih.gov.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9199-7974
T R LagoDepartment of Psychiatry, Boston University School of Medicine, Boston, MA, USA.
A X GorkaSection on Neurobiology of Fear and Anxiety, National Institute of Mental Health, Bethesda, MD, USA.
N L BalderstonCenter for Neuromodulation in Depression and Stress, Department of Psychiatry, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8565-1544
B A FuchsDepartment of Nutritional Sciences, The Pennsylvania State University, University Park, PA, USA.
R C ReynoldsScientific and Statistical Computing Core, National Institute of Mental Health, Bethesda, MD, USA.
C GrillonSection on Neurobiology of Fear and Anxiety, National Institute of Mental Health, Bethesda, MD, USA.
M ErnstSection on Neurobiology of Fear and Anxiety, National Institute of Mental Health, Bethesda, MD, USA.
National Institute of Mental Health · USBoston University · USPennsylvania State University · USUniversity of Pennsylvania · US

Funding

The Psychophysiology Of Fear And AnxietyZIAMH002798 · NIMH · NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF MENTAL HEALTH · PI GRILLON, CHRISTIAN · 2009 to 2022
$29.0M
Intramural NIH HHS ZIA MH002798
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

While a large body of literature documents the impairing effect of anxiety on cognition, performing a demanding task was shown to be effective in reducing anxiety. Here we explored the mechanisms of this anxiolytic effect by examining how a pharmacological challenge designed to improve attentional processes influences the interplay between the neural networks engaged during anxiety and cognition. Using a double-blind between-subject design, we pharmacologically manipulated working memory (WM) using a single oral dose of 20 mg methylphenidate (MPH, cognitive enhancer) or placebo. Fifty healthy adults (25/drug group) performed two runs of a WM N-back task in a 3 T magnetic resonance imaging scanner. This task comprised a low (1-Back) and high (3-Back) WM load, which were performed in two contexts, safety or threat of shocks (induced-anxiety). Analyses revealed that (1) WM accuracy was overall improved by MPH and (2) MPH (vs. placebo) strengthened the engagement of regions within the fronto-parietal control network (FPCN) and reduced the default mode network (DMN) deactivation. These MPH effects predominated in the most difficult context, i.e., threat condition, first run (novelty of the task), and 3-Back task. The facilitation of neural activation can be interpreted as an expansion of cognitive resources, which could foster both the representation and integration of anxiety-provoking stimuli as well as the top-down regulatory processes to protect against the detrimental effect of anxiety. This mechanism might establish an optimal balance between FPCN (cognitive processing) and DMN (emotion regulation) recruitment.

Indexed as

MethylphenidateAdultAnxietyAnxiety DisordersCognitionHumansMemory, Short-TermMethylphenidate

Identifiers

PMID34675189
PMCPMC8531440
OpenAlexW3206316297

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.