Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34675134›Full record

ArticleAging2021

Differences in and verification of genetic alterations in chemotherapy and immunotherapy for metastatic melanoma.

Yang Li, Yuling Gao, Weiling Chu, Jianjian Lv, Zhi Li, Tongxin Shi

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Aging, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
0.2field-weighted citation impact, top 45% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Yang LiDepartment of Dermatology, The Affiliated Qingdao Municipal Hospital of Qingdao University, Qingdao, Shandong, China.
Yuling GaoDepartment of Dermatology, The Affiliated Qingdao Municipal Hospital of Qingdao University, Qingdao, Shandong, China.
Weiling ChuDepartment of Dermatology, The Affiliated Qingdao Municipal Hospital of Qingdao University, Qingdao, Shandong, China.
Jianjian LvDepartment of Oncology, The Affiliated Qingdao Municipal Hospital of Qingdao University, Qingdao, Shandong, China.
Zhi LiDepartment of Dermatology, The Affiliated Qingdao Municipal Hospital of Qingdao University, Qingdao, Shandong, China.
Tongxin ShiDepartment of Dermatology, The Affiliated Qingdao Municipal Hospital of Qingdao University, Qingdao, Shandong, China.
Qingdao Municipal Hospital · CNQingdao University · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundMetastatic melanoma has poor therapeutic response and may present resistance to chemotherapy or immunotherapy. Significant differences are observed in the survival time of patients with metastatic melanoma based on the administration of chemotherapy or immunotherapy; thus, we have explored the important role of specific differential genes between the two therapies in their effect on treatment response in melanoma.

methodsMetastatic melanoma gene expression data (RNAseq, mutation and methylation) and patient clinical information were downloaded from The Cancer Genome Atlas database and grouped according to chemotherapy or immunotherapy. The differentially expressed genes of the two groups were further screened for signature genes through a protein-protein interaction network and Lasso-Cox regression model. Then, differences in the treatment response, overall survival, mutation and methylation of characteristic genes were compared. Finally, western blot and real-time qPCR technology were used to detect the expression differences of the signature genes in metastatic melanoma tumor tissues in patients undergoing chemotherapy and immunotherapy.

resultsThe overall survival of the chemotherapy-based treatment group was significantly higher than that of the immunotherapy-based group. The immune infiltration level of immature dendritic cells (DCs) in the chemotherapy group was significantly higher than that in the immunotherapy group. Finally, seven signature genes were selected:

conclusionIn this study, significant differences in the expression of signature genes were verified. The findings indicate that immature DCs with potential application value should be considered and high mutation sites of signature genes should be identified to reduce the occurrence of treatment resistance.

Indexed as

ImmunotherapyMelanomaSkin NeoplasmsAdultAgedAntineoplastic AgentsFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedProtein Interaction MapsTranscriptomeAntineoplastic Agentschemotherapygenetic alterationsimmunotherapymetastatic melanomaprognostic factorresistance-related genes

Identifiers

PMID34675134
PMCPMC8580330
OpenAlexW3205253754

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.