Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34675080›Full record

ArticleProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America2021

Soil chemistry determines whether defensive plant secondary metabolites promote or suppress herbivore growth.

Lingfei Hu, Zhenwei Wu, Christelle A M Robert, Xiao Ouyang, Tobias Züst, Adrien Mestrot, Jianming Xu, Matthias Erb

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed
10.4field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed, 63 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Root-exuded specialized metabolites reduce arsenic toxicity in maize.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2024
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Lingfei HuInstitute of Soil and Water Resources and Environmental Science, College of Environmental and Resource Sciences, Zhejiang Provincial Key Laboratory of Agricultural Resources and Environment, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou 310058, China.ORCID 0000-0002-7791-9440
Zhenwei WuInstitute of Soil and Water Resources and Environmental Science, College of Environmental and Resource Sciences, Zhejiang Provincial Key Laboratory of Agricultural Resources and Environment, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou 310058, China.ORCID 0000-0002-9418-6170
Christelle A M RobertInstitute of Plant Sciences, University of Bern, 3013 Bern, Switzerland.ORCID 0000-0003-3415-2371
Xiao OuyangInstitute of Soil and Water Resources and Environmental Science, College of Environmental and Resource Sciences, Zhejiang Provincial Key Laboratory of Agricultural Resources and Environment, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou 310058, China.ORCID 0000-0002-8214-8214
Tobias ZüstInstitute of Plant Sciences, University of Bern, 3013 Bern, Switzerland.
Adrien MestrotInstitute of Geography, University of Bern, 3012 Bern, Switzerland.ORCID 0000-0002-4387-3886
Jianming XuInstitute of Soil and Water Resources and Environmental Science, College of Environmental and Resource Sciences, Zhejiang Provincial Key Laboratory of Agricultural Resources and Environment, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou 310058, China; jmxu@zju.edu.cn matthias.erb@ips.unibe.ch.ORCID 0000-0002-2954-9764
Matthias ErbInstitute of Plant Sciences, University of Bern, 3013 Bern, Switzerland; jmxu@zju.edu.cn matthias.erb@ips.unibe.ch.ORCID 0000-0002-4446-9834
University of Bern · CHZhejiang University · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Plant secondary (or specialized) metabolites mediate important interactions in both the rhizosphere and the phyllosphere. If and how such compartmentalized functions interact to determine plant-environment interactions is not well understood. Here, we investigated how the dual role of maize benzoxazinoids as leaf defenses and root siderophores shapes the interaction between maize and a major global insect pest, the fall armyworm. We find that benzoxazinoids suppress fall armyworm growth when plants are grown in soils with very low available iron but enhance growth in soils with higher available iron. Manipulation experiments confirm that benzoxazinoids suppress herbivore growth under iron-deficient conditions and in the presence of chelated iron but enhance herbivore growth in the presence of free iron in the growth medium. This reversal of the protective effect of benzoxazinoids is not associated with major changes in plant primary metabolism. Plant defense activation is modulated by the interplay between soil iron and benzoxazinoids but does not explain fall armyworm performance. Instead, increased iron supply to the fall armyworm by benzoxazinoids in the presence of free iron enhances larval performance. This work identifies soil chemistry as a decisive factor for the impact of plant secondary metabolites on herbivore growth. It also demonstrates how the multifunctionality of plant secondary metabolites drives interactions between abiotic and biotic factors, with potential consequences for plant resistance in variable environments.

Indexed as

HerbivoryAnimalsBenzoxazinesEcosystemHomeostasisIronLarvaPlant LeavesPlant RootsSoilSpodopteraZea maysBenzoxazinesIronSoilbenzoxazinoidsherbivore resistancemaizeplant herbivore interactionsplant secondary metabolites

Identifiers

PMID34675080
PMCPMC8639379
OpenAlexW3207200310

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.