Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34674967›Full record

Observational studyJournal of optometry

Visual and satisfaction results with implantation of the trifocal Panoptix® intraocular lens in cataract surgery.

Virgilio Galvis, Luis C Escaf, Luis J Escaf, Alejandro Tello, Lisi D Rodríguez, Ruth Lapid-Gortzak, Néstor I Carreño, Rubén D Berrospi, Camilo A Niño, Andreas Viberg and 1 more

Open access · goldAbstract readObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in Journal of optometry. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 29 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
29citing papers in PubMed
3.9field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

29 citing papers in PubMed, 36 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Observational
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Observational
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 5 institutions in 3 countries.

Virgilio GalvisCentro Oftalmológico Virgilio Galvis, Floridablanca, Colombia; Fundación Oftalmológica de Santander FOSCAL, Floridablanca, Colombia; Universidad Autónoma de Bucaramanga UNAB, Bucaramanga, Colombia.
Luis C EscafFundación Oftalmológica de Santander FOSCAL, Floridablanca, Colombia; Universidad Autónoma de Bucaramanga UNAB, Bucaramanga, Colombia.
Luis J EscafClínica de Oftalmología del Caribe COFCA, Barranquilla, Colombia.
Alejandro TelloCentro Oftalmológico Virgilio Galvis, Floridablanca, Colombia; Fundación Oftalmológica de Santander FOSCAL, Floridablanca, Colombia; Universidad Autónoma de Bucaramanga UNAB, Bucaramanga, Colombia.
Lisi D RodríguezCentro Oftalmológico Virgilio Galvis, Floridablanca, Colombia; Universidad Autónoma de Bucaramanga UNAB, Bucaramanga, Colombia. Electronic address: lrodriguez438@unab.edu.co.
Ruth Lapid-GortzakAmsterdam Universitary Medical Centers, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Néstor I CarreñoCentro Oftalmológico Virgilio Galvis, Floridablanca, Colombia; Fundación Oftalmológica de Santander FOSCAL, Floridablanca, Colombia; Universidad Autónoma de Bucaramanga UNAB, Bucaramanga, Colombia.
Rubén D BerrospiCentro Oftalmológico Virgilio Galvis, Floridablanca, Colombia; Fundación Oftalmológica de Santander FOSCAL, Floridablanca, Colombia; Universidad Autónoma de Bucaramanga UNAB, Bucaramanga, Colombia.
Camilo A NiñoCentro Oftalmológico Virgilio Galvis, Floridablanca, Colombia; Fundación Oftalmológica de Santander FOSCAL, Floridablanca, Colombia; Universidad Autónoma de Bucaramanga UNAB, Bucaramanga, Colombia.
Andreas VibergDepartment of Clinical Science /Ophthalmology, Umeå University, Umeå, Sweden.
Paul A CamachoCentro Oftalmológico Virgilio Galvis, Floridablanca, Colombia; Fundación Oftalmológica de Santander FOSCAL, Floridablanca, Colombia; Universidad Autónoma de Bucaramanga UNAB, Bucaramanga, Colombia.
Universidad Autónoma de Bucaramanga · COAmsterdam University Medical Centers · NLFoscal Hospital · COUmeå University · SEUniversidad Autónoma del Caribe · CO

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeTo assess visual results (including the Lapid-Kushlin defocus coefficient), and satisfaction, following the implantation of PanOptix® a trifocal intraocular lens.

methodsObservational, retrospective cohort study. 130 eyes of 65 subjects with bilateral implantation were included. Binocular uncorrected visual acuities [distance (Binocular UDVA), intermediate (Binocular UIVA) and near (Binocular UNVA)] were measured. Also, the manifest refraction, binocular defocus curve and binocular contrast sensitivity were determined. The Lapid-Kushlin defocus coefficient, a new single numerical parameter based on the area under the curve of the defocus curve, was calculated. The validated Spanish CATQUEST-9SF satisfaction survey was applied.

resultsPostoperative visual acuity ranges were: binocular UDVA 0.18 to 0.0 LogMAR, binocular UIVA 0.30 to 0.0 LogMAR and Binocular UNVA 0.18 to 0.0 LogMAR. The levels of contrast sensitivity both in bright light conditions (with and without glare) and low light conditions with glare, remained within the limits of normality. Under scotopic conditions without glare values below normality were found at lower spatial frequencies. The binocular defocus curve showed a plateau without a clearly evident peak. The Lapid-Kushlin defocus coefficient was 0.199. Two patients (3.1%) needed glasses after the procedure for near and intermediate vision. No patient manifested great visual difficulties or was dissatisfied with the results.

conclusionsThe trifocal platform showed very good results in this series of patients. 96.9% of the patients achieved independence of the glasses and expressed a high degree of satisfaction. The Lapid-Kushlin defocus coefficient was better than those calculated from literature, for other multifocal intraocular lenses.

Indexed as

CataractLenses, IntraocularHumansLens Implantation, IntraocularPatient SatisfactionPersonal SatisfactionProspective StudiesProsthesis DesignRefraction, OcularRetrospective StudiesVision, BinocularCataract surgeryMultifocal intraocular lensTrifocal intraocular lens

Identifiers

PMID34674967
PMCPMC9237585
OpenAlexW3205041530

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.