Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34674758›Full record

Observational studyAntimicrobial resistance and infection control2021

A pre-pandemic COVID-19 assessment of the costs of prevention and control interventions for healthcare associated infections in medical and surgical wards in Québec.

Eric Tchouaket Nguemeleu, Stephanie Robins, Sandra Boivin, Drissa Sia, Kelley Kilpatrick, Bruno Dubreuil, Catherine Larouche, Natasha Parisien, Josiane Letourneau

Abstract readObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in Antimicrobial resistance and infection control, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Eric Tchouaket NguemeleuDepartment of Nursing Research, Université du Québec en Outaouais, St-Jérôme Campus, 5, rue Saint-Joseph, Office J-2204, Saint-Jérôme, Québec, J7Z 0B7, Canada. eric.tchouaket@uqo.ca.ORCID 0000-0002-4309-0478
Stephanie RobinsDepartment of Nursing Research, Université du Québec en Outaouais, St-Jérôme Campus, 5, rue Saint-Joseph, Office J-2204, Saint-Jérôme, Québec, J7Z 0B7, Canada.
Sandra BoivinCentre Intégré de Santé et de Services Sociaux Des Laurentides, Direction de la Santé Publique, Saint-Jérôme, Québec, Canada.
Drissa SiaDepartment of Nursing Research, Université du Québec en Outaouais, St-Jérôme Campus, 5, rue Saint-Joseph, Office J-2204, Saint-Jérôme, Québec, J7Z 0B7, Canada.
Kelley KilpatrickIngram School of Nursing, McGill University, Montreal, Québec, Canada.
Bruno DubreuilCentre Intégré de Santé et de Services Sociaux de Laval, Laval, Québec, Canada.
Catherine LaroucheCentre Intégré Universitaire de Santé et de Services Sociaux du Saguenay-Lac-Saint-Jean, Laval, Canada.
Natasha ParisienInstitut National de Santé Publique du Québec, Quebec City, Québec, Canada.
Josiane LetourneauDepartment of Nursing Research, Université du Québec en Outaouais, St-Jérôme Campus, 5, rue Saint-Joseph, Office J-2204, Saint-Jérôme, Québec, J7Z 0B7, Canada.

Funding

CIHR 409071Fonds de Recherche du Québec - Santé 35124
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundHealthcare-associated infections (HCAIs) present a major public health problem that significantly affects patients, health care providers and the entire healthcare system. Infection prevention and control programs limit HCAIs and are an indispensable component of patient and healthcare worker safety. The clinical best practices (CBPs) of handwashing, screening, hygiene and sanitation of surfaces and equipment, and basic and additional precautions (e.g., isolation, and donning and removing personal protective equipment) are keystones of infection prevention and control (IPC). There is a lack of rigorous IPC economic evaluations demonstrating the cost-benefit of IPC programs in general, and a lack of assessment of the value of investing in CBPs more specifically.

objectiveThis study aims to assess overall costs associated with each of the four CBPs.

methodsAcross two Quebec hospitals, 48 healthcare workers were observed for two hours each shift, for two consecutive weeks. A modified time-driven activity-based costing framework method was used to capture all human resources (time) and materials (e.g. masks, cloths, disinfectants) required for each clinical best practice. Using a hospital perspective with a time horizon of one year, median costs per CBP per hour, as well as the cost per action, were calculated and reported in 2018 Canadian dollars ($). Sensitivity analyses were performed.

resultsA total of 1831 actions were recorded. The median cost of hand hygiene (N = 867) was 20 cents per action. For cleaning and disinfection of surfaces (N = 102), the cost was 21 cents per action, while cleaning of small equipment (N = 85) was 25 cents per action. Additional precautions median cost was $4.1 per action. The donning or removing or personal protective equipment (N = 720) cost was 76 cents per action. Finally, the total median costs for the five categories of clinical best practiced assessed were 27 cents per action.

conclusionsThe costs of clinical best practices were low, from 20 cents to $4.1 per action. This study provides evidence based arguments with which to support the allocation of resources to infection prevention and control practices that directly affect the safety of patients, healthcare workers and the public. Further research of costing clinical best care practices is warranted.

Indexed as

AdultCanadaCross InfectionDisinfectionFemaleHand HygieneHumansHygieneInfection ControlMaleMasksMiddle AgedPractice Guidelines as TopicProspective StudiesClinical best practiceCostCOVID-19Healthcare associated infectionPrevention and controlTime-driven activity-based costingTime-motion study

Identifiers

PMID34674758
PMCPMC8529371

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.