Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34674682›Full record

ArticleBMC public health2021

Acceptability and feasibility of the school-engaged social and behavior change communication approach on malaria prevention in Ethiopia: implications for engagement, empowerment, and retention (EER) of education sectors in malaria elimination efforts.

Fira Abamecha, Gachana Midaksa, Morankar Sudhakar, Lakew Abebe, Yohannes Kebede, Abebe Mamo, Guda Alemayehu, Zewdie Birhanu

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC public health, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Fira AbamechaDepartment of Health, Behavior, and Society, Faculty of Public Health, Institute of Health, Jimma University, P.O.Box: 378, Jimma, Ethiopia. firamecha@gmail.com.ORCID 0000-0002-8311-5609
Gachana MidaksaDepartment of Public Health, Mizan-Tepi University, College of Medicine and Health Sciences, Mizan-Aman, Ethiopia.
Morankar SudhakarDepartment of Health, Behavior, and Society, Faculty of Public Health, Institute of Health, Jimma University, P.O.Box: 378, Jimma, Ethiopia.
Lakew AbebeDepartment of Health, Behavior, and Society, Faculty of Public Health, Institute of Health, Jimma University, P.O.Box: 378, Jimma, Ethiopia.
Yohannes KebedeDepartment of Health, Behavior, and Society, Faculty of Public Health, Institute of Health, Jimma University, P.O.Box: 378, Jimma, Ethiopia.
Abebe MamoDepartment of Health, Behavior, and Society, Faculty of Public Health, Institute of Health, Jimma University, P.O.Box: 378, Jimma, Ethiopia.
Guda AlemayehuUSAID/Ethiopia office, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia.
Zewdie BirhanuDepartment of Health, Behavior, and Society, Faculty of Public Health, Institute of Health, Jimma University, P.O.Box: 378, Jimma, Ethiopia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundEvidence on process outcomes such as acceptability, and feasibility of behavior change communication interventions are important in program evaluation to understand how, and why such a program works. However; documented evidence on the issue is not available as far as the social and behavior change communication (SBCC) on malaria is concerned. Enrolling the frontline providers this study measured the acceptability and feasibility of the school-engaged SBCC strategy on malaria prevention in malaria-endemic settings of Ethiopia.

methodsA school-engaged SBCC strategy involving various communication and capacity-building interventions aimed to advance malaria preventive practices in primary schools in Jimma were implemented from 2017 to 2019. A cross-sectional study was conducted with 205 key stakeholders at the end of the intervention. Both acceptability and feasibility were measured using standardized tools. Data were collected using a structured questionnaire and filled by the study participants. The SPSS version 26 was used to analyze the data. Multivariate general linear modeling was performed to identify the predictors of acceptability and feasibility of the program. P-value < 5% was considered to decide statistical significance.

resultsThe result showed the mean scores (M, range = R) of acceptability and feasibility of the program were (M = 25.63, R = 6 to 30) and (M = 19.35, R = 5 to 25) respectively. The multivariate linear modeling showed acceptability was affected by self-efficacy; (β = 0.438, P < 0.001), community support; (β = 0.417, P < 0.001), school climate; (β = - 0.16; P = 0.003), perceived malaria threat; (β = 0.40, P < 0.001) and knowledge; (β = 0.229, P = 0.013). Similarly, feasibility was influenced by self-efficacy; (β = 0.352, P < 0.001), community support; (β = 0.591, P < 0.001), school climate; (β = - 0.099, P-value < 0.030) and perceived malaria threat; (β = 0.172, P = 0.002).

conclusionWith a considerably high level of acceptability, the school-engaged SBCC strategy to enhance malaria preventive practices seems feasible. The SBCC strategy targeting personal factors such as malaria threat perceptions, knowledge and skills on the program, and contextual factors that include school social climate and community support would be fruitful to facilitate the implementation of the program. The result implicates the benefit of intensifying such a strategy to engage, empower, and retain the education sectors in malaria elimination efforts and beyond.

Indexed as

MalariaCommunicationCross-Sectional StudiesEthiopiaFeasibility StudiesHumansSchoolsAcceptabilityEthiopiaFeasibilityMalariaSBCCSchoolStakeholders

Identifiers

PMID34674682
PMCPMC8529361

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.