Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34674645›Full record

Trial reportBMC geriatrics2021

Feasibility & Efficacy of Deprescribing rounds in a Singapore rehabilitative hospital- a randomised controlled trial.

Andrew Peng Yong Wong, Tan Wan Ting, Ee Jia Ming Charissa, Tan Wee Boon, Kwan Yu Heng, Low Lian Leng

Registry-linked trialAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in BMC geriatrics, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT03713112 (Efficacy and Feasibility of De-prescribing Rounds in a Singapore Rehabilitative Hospital- a Pilot Randomized Controlled Trial), which is not on this map. Cited by 5 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT03713112 naunknown statusnot on this map

Efficacy and Feasibility of De-prescribing Rounds in a Singapore Rehabilitative Hospital- a Pilot Randomized Controlled Trial

TypeinterventionalSponsorBright Vision HospitalRan2018 to 2020Enrolled260ConditionsDeprescribing, Multi-disciplinary, RoundsArmsWeekly MDT deprescribing rounds for certain drugs
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Impact of Specialized Clinics on Medications Deprescribing in Older Adults: A Pilot Study in Ambulatory Care Clinics in a Teaching Hospital.Saudi pharmaceutical journal : SPJ : the official publication of the Saudi Pharmaceutical Society · 2022
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Andrew Peng Yong WongDepartment of Post-Acute and Continuing Care, Singhealth Community Hospitals, 10 Hospital Boulevard, Singhealth Tower, Singapore, 168582, Singapore. andrew.wong.p.y@singhealthch.com.sg.
Tan Wan TingDepartment of Pharmacy, Singhealth Community Hospitals, 10 Hospital Boulevard, Singapore, 168582, Singapore.
Ee Jia Ming CharissaDepartment of Pharmacy, Singhealth Community Hospitals, 10 Hospital Boulevard, Singapore, 168582, Singapore.
Tan Wee BoonDivision of Medicine, Singapore General Hospital, Outram Road, Singapore, 169608, Singapore.
Kwan Yu HengProgram in Health Services and Systems Research, Duke-NUS Medical School, 8 College Road, Singapore, 169857, Singapore.
Low Lian LengDepartment of Post-Acute and Continuing Care, Singhealth Community Hospitals, 10 Hospital Boulevard, Singhealth Tower, Singapore, 168582, Singapore.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundDeprescribing is effective and safe in reducing polypharmacy among the elderly. However, the impact of deprescribing rounds remain unclear in Asian settings. Hence, we conducted this study.

methodsAn open label randomised controlled trial was conducted on patients of 65 years and above, under rehabilitation or subacute care and with prespecified medications from a Singapore rehabilitation hospital. They were randomised using a computer generated sequence. The intervention consisted of weekly multidisciplinary team-led deprescribing rounds (using five steps of deprescribing) and usual care. The control had only usual care. The primary outcome is the percentage change in total daily dose (TDD) from baseline upon discharge, while the secondary outcomes are the total number of medicine, total daily cost and TDD up to day 28 postdischarge, overall side-effect rates, rounding time and the challenges. Efficacy outcomes were analysed using intention-to-treat while other outcomes were analysed as per protocol.

results260 patients were randomised and 253 were analysed after excluding dropouts (female: 57.3%; median age: 76 years). Baseline characteristics were largely similar in both groups. The intervention arm (n = 126) experienced a greater reduction of TDD on discharge [Median (IQR): - 19.62% (- 34.38, 0.00%) versus 0.00% (- 12.00, 6.82%); p < 0.001], more constipation (OR: 3.75, 95% CI:1.75-8.06, p < 0.001) and laxative re-prescriptions (OR: 2.82, 95% CI:1.30-6.12, p = 0.009) though death and hospitalisation rates were similar. The median rounding time was 7.09 min per patient and challenges include the inconvenience in assembling the multidisciplinary team.

conclusionDeprescribing rounds can safely reduce TDD of medicine upon discharge compared to usual care in a Singaporean rehabilitation hospital.

trial registrationThis study is first registered at Clinicaltrials.gov (protocol number: NCT03713112 ) on 19/10/2018 and the protocol can be accessed on https://www.clinicaltrials.gov .

Indexed as

DeprescriptionsAftercareAgedFeasibility StudiesFemaleHospitals, RehabilitationHumansPatient DischargeSingaporeDeprescribingMultidisciplinary teamOpen labelRandomised controlled trialRounds

Identifiers

PMID34674645
PMCPMC8529728

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.