Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34674498›Full record

ReviewEuropean geriatric medicine2018

Sarcopenia and osteoporosis in older people: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Barbara Rubek Nielsen, Jawdat Abdulla, Hanne Elkjær Andersen, Peter Schwarz, Charlotte Suetta

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in European geriatric medicine, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 58 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
58citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
6.4field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

58 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 144 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Trial
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Association between myosteatosis and bone mineral density in postmenopausal women.Osteoporosis international : a journal established as result of cooperation between the European Foundation for Osteoporosis and the National Osteoporosis Foundation of the USA · 2026
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Bone-muscle interactions.Osteoporosis and sarcopenia · 2025
    Review
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Barbara Rubek NielsenMedical Department M, Amager and Hvidovre Hospital, Valdemar Hansens Vej 1-23, 2610, Glostrup, Denmark. Barbara_rubek@hotmail.com.
Jawdat AbdullaMedical Department M, Amager and Hvidovre Hospital, Valdemar Hansens Vej 1-23, 2610, Glostrup, Denmark.
Hanne Elkjær AndersenMedical Department M, Amager and Hvidovre Hospital, Valdemar Hansens Vej 1-23, 2610, Glostrup, Denmark.
Peter SchwarzDepartment of Endocrinology, Rigshospitalet and Faculty of Health Sciences, Copenhagen University, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Charlotte SuettaDepartment of Geriatric Medicine, Frederiksberg and Bispebjerg Hospital and Faculty of Health Sciences, Copenhagen University, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Hvidovre Hospital · DKAmager Hospital · DKBispebjerg Hospital · DKRigshospitalet · DK

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAge-related loss of muscle and bone (sarcopenia and osteoporosis), increases the risk of falls and fractures and consequently leads to a substantial economic burden for the society. The combined condition, osteosarcopenia, may identify patients at a higher risk of those outcomes and could be relevant for assessment and treatment in clinical practice.

aimTo evaluate the current knowledge of the prevalence of osteosarcopenia and the fracture risk in older people.

methodA systematic literature review was conducted until 10th March 2018. A total of 1105 papers were detected, whereof 1049 and 29 were excluded by title/abstracts and full-text assessment, respectively. Twenty-seven original papers were included in the systematic review, whereof 17 were suitable for meta-analysis.

resultsThe prevalence of osteosarcopenia varied (5-37%) depending on the classification of sarcopenia and whether participants were classified initially according to sarcopenia or osteoporosis. In patients with low-energy osteoporotic fractures, sarcopenia was present in 7.8-58% and 1.3-96.3% of the cases, women and men, respectively. The meta-analysis of prevalence of sarcopenia in patients with low-energy fracture (n = 9) was 46% (95% CI 44, 48; p < 0.001). The relative risk of fracture (sarcopenic versus non-sarcopenic) in meta-analysis of four studies was 1.37 (95% CI 1.18, 1.59; p < 0.001). Mean bone mineral density (n = 5) and T-score (n = 3) of femoral neck was significantly lower in sarcopenic participants [- 0.07 g/cm

conclusionOsteosarcopenia is frequent and the relative risk of fracture is higher among sarcopenic patients. A standard and strict classification of sarcopenia is needed to assess its true relationship and consequences.

Indexed as

FractureOlderOsteoporosisOsteosarcopeniaSarcopenia

Identifiers

PMID34674498
OpenAlexW2884354144

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.