Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34674064›Full record

SynthesisCurrent psychiatry reports2021

COVID-19 Pandemic and Eating Disorders: What Can We Learn About Psychopathology and Treatment? A Systematic Review.

Alessio Maria Monteleone, Giammarco Cascino, Eugenia Barone, Marco Carfagno, Palmiero Monteleone

Open access · hybridAbstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Current psychiatry reports, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
3.9field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 32 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Pathways to eating disorder care: A European multicenter study.European psychiatry : the journal of the Association of European Psychiatrists · 2023
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Alessio Maria MonteleoneDepartment of Psychiatry, University of Campania "Luigi Vanvitelli,", Naples, Italy. alessiomaria.monteleone@unicampania.it.
Giammarco CascinoDepartment of Medicine, Surgery and Dentistry 'Scuola Medica Salernitana,' Section of Neurosciences, University of Salerno, Salerno, Italy.
Eugenia BaroneDepartment of Psychiatry, University of Campania "Luigi Vanvitelli,", Naples, Italy.
Marco CarfagnoDepartment of Psychiatry, University of Campania "Luigi Vanvitelli,", Naples, Italy.
Palmiero MonteleoneDepartment of Medicine, Surgery and Dentistry 'Scuola Medica Salernitana,' Section of Neurosciences, University of Salerno, Salerno, Italy.
University of Campania "Luigi Vanvitelli" · ITUniversity of Salerno · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purpose of reviewThis systematic review aims to collect evidence regarding the impact of the SarsCov-2 pandemic on people affected by eating disorders (EDs) targeting the following variables: psychopathology changes, mechanisms of vulnerability or resilience, and perception of treatment modifications during the pandemic. RECENT

findingsSince the beginning of the pandemic, a mental health deterioration has been detected in the general population and especially in people affected by pre-existing psychiatric conditions. Furthermore, mental healthcare has moved toward online treatment. ED people showed a trend toward worsening of ED-specific psychopathology and impairment in general psychopathology. The most common vulnerability mechanisms were social isolation and feelings of uncertainty, while heightened self-care and reduced social pressure were resilience factors. The online treatment, although raising many concerns related to its quality, was considered the best alternative to the face-to-face approach. These findings may support the idea that stressful events contribute to the exacerbation of ED psychopathology and highlight the relevance of internalizing symptoms in EDs. The identification of putative risk and resilience variables as well as of subjective factors affecting online treatment perception may inform healthcare professionals and may promote more personalized approaches.

Indexed as

COVID-19Feeding and Eating DisordersHumansPandemicsPsychopathologySARS-CoV-2COVID-19Eating disordersPsychopathologyRiskSystematic reviewTreatment

Identifiers

PMID34674064
PMCPMC8528944
OpenAlexW3205231961

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.