Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34674031›Full record

ArticleJournal of cancer research and clinical oncology2022

Combination of treosulfan, fludarabine and cytarabine as conditioning in patients with acute myeloid leukemia, myelodysplastic syndrome and myeloproliferative neoplasms.

Samantha O'Hagan Henderson, Jochen J Frietsch, Inken Hilgendorf, Andreas Hochhaus, Claus-Henning Köhne, Jochen Casper

Open access · hybridAbstract readEvaluation Study
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of cancer research and clinical oncology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
0.6field-weighted citation impact, top 33% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Is There (Still) a Place for Sequential Conditioning?Current oncology (Toronto, Ont.) · 2025
    Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Samantha O'Hagan Henderson *Onkologie und Hämatologie, Universitätsklinikum Oldenburg, Klinik Für Innere Medizin II, Oldenburg, Germany.
Jochen J Frietsch *Abteilung Hämatologie und Internistische Onkologie, Universitätsklinikum Jena, Klinik Für Innere Medizin II, Am Klinikum 1, 07747, Jena, Germany. jochen.frietsch@med.uni-jena.de.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1476-8059
Inken HilgendorfAbteilung Hämatologie und Internistische Onkologie, Universitätsklinikum Jena, Klinik Für Innere Medizin II, Am Klinikum 1, 07747, Jena, Germany.
Andreas HochhausAbteilung Hämatologie und Internistische Onkologie, Universitätsklinikum Jena, Klinik Für Innere Medizin II, Am Klinikum 1, 07747, Jena, Germany.
Claus-Henning KöhneOnkologie und Hämatologie, Universitätsklinikum Oldenburg, Klinik Für Innere Medizin II, Oldenburg, Germany.
Jochen CasperOnkologie und Hämatologie, Universitätsklinikum Oldenburg, Klinik Für Innere Medizin II, Oldenburg, Germany.
Klinikum Magdeburg · DEKlinikum Oldenburg · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeTreosulfan and fludarabine (Treo/Flu) were successfully introduced into toxicity-reduced conditioning for SCT. However, the risk of post-SCT relapse remains a matter of concern. We report the results of a novel individual treatment approach with Treo/Flu and cytarabine (Treo/Flu/AraC) conditioning prior to allogeneic SCT in patients with acute myeloid leukemia (AML), myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS), or myeloproliferative neoplasms (MPN).

methodsSeventy-seven patients (median age 54 years) at high risk of disease relapse due to unfavorable cytogenetics or failure to achieve complete remission prior to SCT were included. Median follow-up was 3.2 years.

resultsThe 1-, 2- and 3-year RFS rates were 49.4%, 41.7%, and 37.6% and OS rates were 59.3%, 49.3%, and 45.4%, respectively. Cumulative incidence of NRM was 10% at 100 days, 18.8% at 1 year and 20.1% at 2 years. The cumulative incidence of relapse increased from 31% at 1 year to 38.5% after 3 years. The cumulative incidences of engraftment, chimerism, graft-versus-host disease (GvHD) and toxicities were acceptable and comparable with similar patients conditioned with Treo/Flu or FLAMSA-RIC.

conclusionIn conclusion, Treo/Flu/AraC provides tolerable, feasible, and effective conditioning for patients with AML, MDS or MPN, even in advanced disease states. The incidence of NRM and relapse is acceptable in this heavily pre-treated population with high-risk disease. Future research will aim to confirm these initial findings and include a larger number of participants in a prospective trial.

Indexed as

Graft vs Host DiseaseHematopoietic Stem Cell TransplantationLeukemia, Myeloid, AcuteMyelodysplastic SyndromesMyeloproliferative DisordersBusulfanCytarabineHumansMiddle AgedRecurrenceRetrospective StudiesTransplantation ConditioningVidarabineBusulfanCytarabinefludarabinetreosulfanVidarabineAllogeneic stem cell transplantationAMLMDSMPNToxicity-reduced conditioning

Identifiers

PMID34674031
PMCPMC9470667
OpenAlexW3187040378

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.