Trial reportArchives of orthopaedic and trauma surgery2022
Hyperosmolar dextrose injection for Osgood-Schlatter disease: a double-blind, randomized controlled trial.
Trial report in Archives of orthopaedic and trauma surgery, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 13 citations in OpenAlex.
- Non-surgical treatment for lower limb apophyseal injuries.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2026Pooled it
- Treatments for Osgood Schlatter Disease: A Systematic Review of the Literature.Orthopaedic journal of sports medicine · 2026Review
- The association between patellar malalignment and Osgood-Schlatter disease in children.Frontiers in pediatrics · 2026Article
- The Effectiveness of Ultrasound-Guided Glucose Combined with Mecobalamin Neurolysis in Treating Patients with Refractory Painful Peripheral Neuropathy Using the DCEC Ultrasound Score: A Retrospective Study.Journal of pain research · 2026Article
- Efficacy of Hyperosmolar Dextrose Injection for Osgood-Schlatter Disease: A Systematic Review with Meta-Analysis.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
- The Effectiveness of Treating Osgood-Schlatter Disease (OSD) with Leukocyte-Rich Platelet-Rich Plasma (LR-PRP) Depending on the Duration of the Disease.Journal of clinical medicine · 2024Article
- Enhanced Pain Relief and Function Improvement in Children with Osgood-Schlatter Disease: Leukocyte-Rich Platelet-Rich Plasma (LR-PRP) as a Complementary Treatment to Standard Conservative Therapy.Medical science monitor : international medical journal of experimental and clinical research · 2023Article
- Osgood-Schlatter Disease: Appearance, Diagnosis and Treatment: A Narrative Review.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveOsgood-Schlatter disease (OSD) is one of the common causes of long-term knee pain, leading to functional limitations, long-term deformity of the tubercle interfering with kneeling, and impaired peer-important sport participation. Nonetheless, patient management continues to rely on the usual conservative methods. This study examined the use of hyperosmolar dextrose injection in patients with OSD.
methodsWe conducted a randomized, double-blind clinical trial involving 70 patients with OSD. One group received a hyperosmolar dextrose injection (12.5%), while the other received a saline injection. The injections were conducted under ultrasound guidance. The Victorian Institute of Sport Assessment (VISA) score was used to assess each patient's pain and sport level.
resultsThe dextrose group outperformed the saline group in improvement in the VISA-Patella (VISA-P) score from baseline to 3 months (27.1 ± 6.5 vs. 1.4 ± 2.6; mean difference 25.4 (22.4 to 28.3); p < .0001), 6 months (31.7 ± 7.9 vs. 25.2 ± 7.8; mean difference 6.2 (3.2 to 9.4); p < .0001), and 12 months (34 ± 9.0 vs. 28.2 ± 7.5; mean difference 5.5 (1.9 to 9.1); p = .0026). The changes in both groups were clinically important, suggesting that both therapies were active treatments. The dextrose group improved too rapidly for spontaneous improvement to explain much of this change.
conclusionAfter three injections, at the 6-month and 12-month follow-up visits, the VISA-P scores of the two groups were significantly improved; the dextrose group score was better than the saline group score, and there were significant differences between the two groups.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.