Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34673804›Full record

ArticlePloS one2021

Proximal-end bias from in-vitro reconstituted nucleosomes and the result on downstream data analysis.

David A Bates, Charles E Bates, Andrew S Earl, Colin Skousen, Ashley N Fetbrandt, Jordon Ritchie, Paul M Bodily, Steven M Johnson

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

David A BatesDepartment of Microbiology and Molecular Biology, Brigham Young University, Provo, Utah, United States of America.
Charles E BatesQubit Software LLC, Spanish Fork, Utah, United States of America.
Andrew S EarlDepartment of Microbiology and Molecular Biology, Brigham Young University, Provo, Utah, United States of America.
Colin SkousenDepartment of Microbiology and Molecular Biology, Brigham Young University, Provo, Utah, United States of America.
Ashley N FetbrandtDepartment of Microbiology and Molecular Biology, Brigham Young University, Provo, Utah, United States of America.
Jordon RitchieDepartment of Microbiology and Molecular Biology, Brigham Young University, Provo, Utah, United States of America.
Paul M BodilyComputer Science Department, Idaho State University, Pocatello, Idaho, United States of America.
Steven M JohnsonDepartment of Microbiology and Molecular Biology, Brigham Young University, Provo, Utah, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0002-7399-8153

Funding

Overcoming Transgene Silencing by DNA-Directed Chromatin ReconformationR15GM110646 · NIGMS · BRIGHAM YOUNG UNIVERSITY · PI JOHNSON, STEVEN M. · 2014 to 2014
$330k
NIGMS NIH HHS R15 GM110646
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The most basic level of eukaryotic gene regulation is the presence or absence of nucleosomes on DNA regulatory elements. In an effort to elucidate in vivo nucleosome patterns, in vitro studies are frequently used. In vitro, short DNA fragments are more favorable for nucleosome formation, increasing the likelihood of nucleosome occupancy. This may in part result from the fact that nucleosomes prefer to form on the terminal ends of linear DNA. This phenomenon has the potential to bias in vitro reconstituted nucleosomes and skew results. If the ends of DNA fragments are known, the reads falling close to the ends are typically discarded. In this study we confirm the phenomenon of end bias of in vitro nucleosomes. We describe a method in which nearly identical libraries, with different known ends, are used to recover nucleosomes which form towards the terminal ends of fragmented DNA. Finally, we illustrate that although nucleosomes prefer to form on DNA ends, it does not appear to skew results or the interpretation thereof.

Indexed as

GenomeTranscription, GeneticAnimalsCaenorhabditis elegansCaenorhabditis elegans ProteinsDNAIn Vitro TechniquesNucleosomesCaenorhabditis elegans ProteinsDNANucleosomes

Identifiers

PMID34673804
PMCPMC8530345

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.