Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34673283›Full record

ReviewMolecular & cellular proteomics : MCP2021

An Introduction to Advanced Targeted Acquisition Methods.

Mirjam van Bentum, Matthias Selbach

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Molecular & cellular proteomics : MCP, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 58 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
58citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

58 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Direct Comparison of MRM-MS and PRM-MS Methods for Quantitative Ganglioside Analysis.Journal of the American Society for Mass Spectrometry · 2026
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Quantification of Peptides in Food Hydrolysate fromFoods (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025
    Article
  19. Article
  20. A novel MRI contrast agent NaGdFScientific reports · 2025
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Mirjam van BentumProteome Dynamics, Max Delbrück Center for Molecular Medicine, Berlin, Germany; Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany.
Matthias SelbachProteome Dynamics, Max Delbrück Center for Molecular Medicine, Berlin, Germany; Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany. Electronic address: matthias.selbach@mdc-berlin.de.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Targeted proteomics via selected reaction monitoring (SRM) or parallel reaction monitoring (PRM) enables fast and sensitive detection of a preselected set of target peptides. However, the number of peptides that can be monitored in conventional targeting methods is usually rather small. Recently, a series of methods has been described that employ intelligent acquisition strategies to increase the efficiency of mass spectrometers to detect target peptides. These methods are based on one of two strategies. First, retention time adjustment-based methods enable intelligent scheduling of target peptide retention times. These include Picky, iRT, as well as spike-in free real-time adjustment methods such as MaxQuant.Live. Second, in spike-in triggered acquisition methods such as SureQuant, Pseudo-PRM, TOMAHAQ, and Scout-MRM, targeted scans are initiated by abundant labeled synthetic peptides added to samples before the run. Both strategies enable the mass spectrometer to better focus data acquisition time on target peptides. This either enables more sensitive detection or a higher number of targets per run. Here, we provide an overview of available advanced targeting methods and highlight their intrinsic strengths and weaknesses and compatibility with specific experimental setups. Our goal is to provide a basic introduction to advanced targeting methods for people starting to work in this field.

Indexed as

AnimalsHumansMass SpectrometryPeptidesProteomicsPeptidesiRTIS-PRMMaxQuant.LiveMRMPickyPRMSRMSureQuanttargeted proteomicsTOMAHAQ

Identifiers

PMID34673283
PMCPMC8600983

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.