Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34673181›Full record

ArticleFood and chemical toxicology : an international journal published for the British Industrial Biological Research Association2021

Toxicity, uptake, and nuclear translocation of ingested micro-nanoplastics in an in vitro model of the small intestinal epithelium.

Glen M DeLoid, Xiaoqiong Cao, Dimitrios Bitounis, Dilpreet Singh, Paula Montero Llopis, Brian Buckley, Philip Demokritou

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Food and chemical toxicology : an international journal published for the British Industrial Biological Research Association, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 36 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
36citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

36 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Hydrophobins fromEnvironmental science & technology · 2025
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Glen M DeLoidCenter for Nanotechnology and Nanotoxicology, Department of Environmental Health, Harvard T. H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, MA, 02115, USA.
Xiaoqiong CaoCenter for Nanotechnology and Nanotoxicology, Department of Environmental Health, Harvard T. H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, MA, 02115, USA.
Dimitrios BitounisCenter for Nanotechnology and Nanotoxicology, Department of Environmental Health, Harvard T. H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, MA, 02115, USA.
Dilpreet SinghCenter for Nanotechnology and Nanotoxicology, Department of Environmental Health, Harvard T. H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, MA, 02115, USA.
Paula Montero LlopisMicRoN Core Facility, Department of Microbiology, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, 02115, USA.
Brian BuckleyEnvironmental, Occupational Health and Safety Institute (EOHSI), Rutgers University, Piscataway, NJ, 08854, USA.
Philip DemokritouCenter for Nanotechnology and Nanotoxicology, Department of Environmental Health, Harvard T. H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, MA, 02115, USA; Environmental, Occupational Health and Safety Institute (EOHSI), Rutgers University, Piscataway, NJ, 08854, USA. Electronic address: pdemokri@hsph.harvard.edu.

Funding

Engineered Nanomaterial Synthesis, Characterization and Method Development Center for Nano-safety ResearchU24ES026946 · NIEHS · HARVARD SCHOOL OF PUBLIC HEALTH · PI DEMOKRITOU, PHILIP · 2016 to 2020
$3.8M
NIEHS NIH HHS U24 ES026946
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Despite mounting evidence of increasing micro- and nanoplastics (MNPs) in natural environments, food, and drinking water, little is known of the potential health hazards of MNPs ingestion. We assessed toxicity and uptake of environmentally relevant MNPs in an in vitro small intestinal epithelium (SIE). Test MNPs included 25 and 1000 nm polystyrene (PS) microspheres (PS25 and PS1K); 25, 100, and 1000 nm carboxyl modified PS spheres (PS25C, PS100C, and PS1KC), and secondary MNPs from incinerated polyethylene (PEI). MNPs were subjected to 3-phase digestion to mimic transformations in the gastrointestinal tract (GIT) and digestas applied to the SIE. Carboxylated MNPs significantly reduced viability and increased permeability to 3 kD dextran. Uptake of carboxyl PS materials was size dependent, with significantly greater uptake of PS25C. Fluorescence confocal imaging showed some PS25C agglomerates entering cells independent of endosomes (suggesting diffusion), others within actin shells (suggesting phagocytosis), and many free within the epithelial cells, including agglomerates within nuclei. Pre-treatment with the dynamin inhibitor Dyngo partially reduced PS25 translocation, suggesting a potential role for endocytosis. These findings suggest that ingestion exposures to MNPs could have serious health consequences and underscore the urgent need for additional detailed studies of the potential hazards of ingested MNPs.

Indexed as

Cell NucleusActinsBiological TransportCaco-2 CellsEndocytosisEnvironmental ExposureEpithelial CellsHT29 CellsHumansIntestinal MucosaIntestine, SmallMicroplasticsMicrospheresNanostructuresOptical ImagingParticle SizeActinsMicroplasticsPolyethylenePolystyrenesWater Pollutants, ChemicalIngestionMicroplasticsPermeabilityPolyethylenePolystyreneToxicity

Identifiers

PMID34673181
PMCPMC8800148

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.