Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34672075›Full record

ArticleGenes, brain, and behavior2021

Heritable variation in locomotion, reward sensitivity and impulsive behaviors in a genetically diverse inbred mouse panel.

Lauren S Bailey, Jared R Bagley, Rainy Dodd, Ashley Olson, Mikayla Bolduc, Vivek M Philip, Laura G Reinholdt, Stacey J Sukoff Rizzo, Lisa Tarantino, Leona Gagnon and 2 more

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Genes, brain, and behavior, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed
3.1field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 19 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. eNeuro
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Lauren S BaileyState University of New York - Binghamton University, Binghamton, New York, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-7155-5877
Jared R BagleyState University of New York - Binghamton University, Binghamton, New York, USA.
Rainy DoddThe Jackson Laboratory, Bar Harbor, Maine, USA.
Ashley OlsonThe Jackson Laboratory, Bar Harbor, Maine, USA.
Mikayla BolducThe Jackson Laboratory, Bar Harbor, Maine, USA.
Vivek M PhilipThe Jackson Laboratory, Bar Harbor, Maine, USA.
Laura G ReinholdtThe Jackson Laboratory, Bar Harbor, Maine, USA.
Stacey J Sukoff RizzoThe Jackson Laboratory, Bar Harbor, Maine, USA.
Lisa TarantinoThe Jackson Laboratory, Bar Harbor, Maine, USA.
Leona GagnonThe Jackson Laboratory, Bar Harbor, Maine, USA.
Elissa J CheslerThe Jackson Laboratory, Bar Harbor, Maine, USA.
James David JentschState University of New York - Binghamton University, Binghamton, New York, USA.
Jackson Laboratory · USBinghamton University · USUniversity of North Carolina at Chapel Hill · USUniversity of Pittsburgh · US

Funding

Project 5: Circadian RhythmsP50DA039841 · NIDA · JACKSON LABORATORY · PI LAURA G REINHOLDT · 2016 to 2026
$26.2M
Development and Neuroadaptations in Alcohol and Addictions (DNA2)T32AA025606 · NIAAA · STATE UNIVERSITY OF NY,BINGHAMTON · PI J. DAVID JENTSCH · 2017 to 2026
$2.7M
NIAAA NIH HHS T32 AA025606NIDA NIH HHS P50 DA039841
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Drugs of abuse, including alcohol and stimulants like cocaine, produce effects that are subject to individual variability, and genetic variation accounts for at least a portion of those differences. Notably, research in both animal models and human subjects point toward reward sensitivity and impulsivity as being trait characteristics that predict relatively greater positive subjective responses to stimulant drugs. Here we describe use of the eight collaborative cross (CC) founder strains and 38 (reversal learning) or 10 (all other tests) CC strains to examine the heritability of reward sensitivity and impulsivity traits, as well as genetic correlations between these measures and existing addiction-related phenotypes. Strains were all tested for activity in an open field and reward sensitivity (intake of chocolate BOOST®). Mice were then divided into two counterbalanced groups and underwent reversal learning (impulsive action and waiting impulsivity) or delay discounting (impulsive choice). CC and founder mice show significant heritability for impulsive action, impulsive choice, waiting impulsivity, locomotor activity, and reward sensitivity, with each impulsive phenotype determined to be non-correlating, independent traits. This research was conducted within the broader, inter-laboratory effort of the Center for Systems Neurogenetics of Addiction (CSNA) to characterize CC and DO mice for multiple, cocaine abuse related traits. These data will facilitate the discovery of genetic correlations between predictive traits, which will then guide discovery of genes and genetic variants that contribute to addictive behaviors.

Indexed as

Genetic VariationImpulsive BehaviorRewardAnimalsFemaleInbreedingLocomotionMaleMiceMice, Inbred C57BLMice, Inbred NODSubstance-Related Disordersaddiction susceptibilitycollaborative crossdelay discountingimpulsive actionimpulsive choiceimpulsivitylocomotionrecombinant inbred strainsreversal learningreward sensitivity

Identifiers

PMID34672075
PMCPMC9044817
OpenAlexW3153393383

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.