Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34671936›Full record

ArticlePsychonomic bulletin & review2022

The role of iconic gestures and mouth movements in face-to-face communication.

Anna Krason, Rebecca Fenton, Rosemary Varley, Gabriella Vigliocco

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Psychonomic bulletin & review, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Understanding discourse in face-to-face settings: The impact of multimodal cues and listening conditions.Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition · 2025
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Gestures speed up responses to questions.Language, cognition and neuroscience · 2024
    Article
  8. Benefit of visual speech information for word comprehension in post-stroke aphasia.Cortex; a journal devoted to the study of the nervous system and behavior · 2023
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Anna KrasonDivision of Psychology and Language Science, University College London, 26 Bedford Way, London, WC1H 0AP, UK. anna.krason.15@ucl.ac.uk.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4162-3584
Rebecca FentonDivision of Psychology and Language Science, University College London, 26 Bedford Way, London, WC1H 0AP, UK.
Rosemary VarleyDivision of Psychology and Language Science, University College London, 26 Bedford Way, London, WC1H 0AP, UK.
Gabriella ViglioccoDivision of Psychology and Language Science, University College London, 26 Bedford Way, London, WC1H 0AP, UK.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Human face-to-face communication is multimodal: it comprises speech as well as visual cues, such as articulatory and limb gestures. In the current study, we assess how iconic gestures and mouth movements influence audiovisual word recognition. We presented video clips of an actress uttering single words accompanied, or not, by more or less informative iconic gestures. For each word we also measured the informativeness of the mouth movements from a separate lipreading task. We manipulated whether gestures were congruent or incongruent with the speech, and whether the words were audible or noise vocoded. The task was to decide whether the speech from the video matched a previously seen picture. We found that congruent iconic gestures aided word recognition, especially in the noise-vocoded condition, and the effect was larger (in terms of reaction times) for more informative gestures. Moreover, more informative mouth movements facilitated performance in challenging listening conditions when the speech was accompanied by gestures (either congruent or incongruent) suggesting an enhancement when both cues are present relative to just one. We also observed (a trend) that more informative mouth movements speeded up word recognition across clarity conditions, but only when the gestures were absent. We conclude that listeners use and dynamically weight the informativeness of gestures and mouth movements available during face-to-face communication.

Indexed as

GesturesSpeech PerceptionComprehensionHumansLipreadingSpeechIconic gesturesMouth movementsMultimodal communicationWord recognition

Identifiers

PMID34671936
PMCPMC9038814

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.