ArticleClinical oral investigations2022
ICCMS™ root caries lesions stages and their underlying depth towards the pulp: an in vitro study with histologic evaluation.
Article in Clinical oral investigations, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.
- Accuracy of visual and radiographic ICDAS-merged criteria for secondary caries on permanent posterior teeth.Journal of clinical and experimental dentistry · 2026Review
- Silver diamine fluoride versus sodium fluoride varnish in the treatment of proximal caries in primary molars: A randomized clinical trial.The Saudi dental journal · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 2 institutions in 3 countries.
Funding
Abstract
objectiveTo examine the relationship between the ICCMS™ (International Caries Classification and Managing System) features of root caries lesions and the underlying depth of the lesion towards the pulp. In order to control for bias, the study followed the tailored document for risk of bias assessment (RoB-tool) recently published. A pilot study showed that the outline of the pulp was much clearer on horizontal compared to vertical sections through the lesions (p = 0.03) and that the histological stereomicroscopical (SM) assessed lesion depth towards the pulp was not influenced by the cutting direction (p = 0.155). MATERIAL AND
methodsA sample of extracted permanent molar teeth (n = 100) were classified independently by two of the authors according to ICCMS™ as no sign of root caries lesion 0 = sound; 1 = initial lesion (non-cavitated); 2 = moderate lesion (cavity depth ≤ 2 mm) and 3 = extensive lesion (cavity depth > 2 mm). After horizontal sectioning (HS) through the lesion, the depth of the underlying lesion was SM assessed independently by two of the authors as 0 = no lesion; 1 = lesion in outer 1/3; 2 = middle 1/3; and 3 = inner 1/3 of the dentine towards the pulp.
resultsIntra- and inter-reproducibility (weighted kappa values ≥ 0.83); the accuracy (Spearman's rho-values) = 0.94 and 0.95; and specificity/sensitivities/AUC values (three different thresholds) were ≥ 0.91, ≥ 0.93, and ≥ 0.96, respectively.
conclusionUnder the umbrella of the RoB-tool, the validity in terms of the reproducibility and accuracy of the ICCMS™ root caries scoring system was high. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: By means of the ICCMS™ root caries scoring system, the underlying lesion depth can be estimated, which must be considered when managing the lesion.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.