Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34671775›Full record

ArticlemedRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences2021

Taste loss as a distinct symptom of COVID-19: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Mackenzie E Hannum, Riley J Koch, Vicente A Ramirez, Sarah S Marks, Aurora K Toskala, Riley D Herriman, Cailu Lin, Paule V Joseph, Danielle R Reed

Open access · greenAbstract readPreprint
In one paragraph

Article in medRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed, 14 citations in OpenAlex.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Mackenzie E HannumMonell Chemical Senses Center, 3500 Market St, Philadelphia PA 19104.
Riley J KochMonell Chemical Senses Center, 3500 Market St, Philadelphia PA 19104.
Vicente A RamirezMonell Chemical Senses Center, 3500 Market St, Philadelphia PA 19104.
Sarah S MarksMonell Chemical Senses Center, 3500 Market St, Philadelphia PA 19104.
Aurora K ToskalaMonell Chemical Senses Center, 3500 Market St, Philadelphia PA 19104.
Riley D HerrimanMonell Chemical Senses Center, 3500 Market St, Philadelphia PA 19104.
Cailu LinMonell Chemical Senses Center, 3500 Market St, Philadelphia PA 19104.
Paule V JosephDivision of Intramural Research, National Institute of Nursing Research, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, USA.
Danielle R ReedMonell Chemical Senses Center, 3500 Market St, Philadelphia PA 19104.
Monell Chemical Senses Center · USNational Institutes of Health · USUniversity of California, Merced · US

Funding

INTERDISCIPLINARY TRAINING IN THE CHEMICAL SENSEST32DC000014 · NIDCD · MONELL CHEMICAL SENSES CENTER · PI PAMELA HELEN DALTON, Joel D Mainland · 1989 to 2026
$6.2M
SCENTinel: A Rapid Smell Test for COVID-19 SurveillanceU01DC019578 · NIDCD · MONELL CHEMICAL SENSES CENTER · PI DALTON, PAMELA HELEN, PARMA, VALENTINA · 2021 to 2023
$1.2M
Mechanisms Underlying Individual Variations of Taste and Smell in ObesityZIAAA000135 · NIAAA · NATIONAL INSTITUTE ON ALCOHOL ABUSE AND ALCOHOLISM · PI JOSEPH, PAULE · 2021 to 2025
$1.2M
NIDCD NIH HHS T32 DC000014NIDCD NIH HHS U01 DC019578
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Chemosensory scientists have been skeptical that reports of COVID-19 taste loss are genuine, in part because before COVID-19, taste loss was rare and often confused with smell loss. Therefore, to establish the predicted prevalence rate of taste loss in COVID-19 patients, we conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis of 376 papers published in 2020-2021, with 241 meeting all inclusion criteria. Additionally, we explored how methodological differences (direct vs. self-report measures) may affect these estimates. We hypothesized that direct prevalence measures of taste loss would be the most valid because they avoid the taste/smell confusion of self-report. The meta-analysis showed that, among 138,897 COVID-19-positive patients, 39.2% reported taste dysfunction (95% CI: 35.34-43.12%), and the prevalence estimates were slightly but not significantly higher from studies using direct (n = 18) versus self-report (n = 223) methodologies (Q = 0.57, df = 1, p = 0.45). Generally, males reported lower rates of taste loss than did females and taste loss was highest in middle-aged groups. Thus, taste loss is a bona fide symptom COVID-19, meriting further research into the most appropriate direct methods to measure it and its underlying mechanisms.

Identifiers

PMID34671775
PMCPMC8528083
OpenAlexW3207314559

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.