Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34671753›Full record

ArticleThe Lancet regional health. Western Pacific2021

Assessing the Inequality of Early Child Development in China - A Population-Based Study.

Yunting Zhang, Le Kang, Jin Zhao, Prof Yingquan Song, Prof Fan Jiang, Chunling Lu

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The Lancet regional health. Western Pacific, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 22 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
22citing papers in PubMed
3.2field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

22 citing papers in PubMed, 42 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Structural Determinants of Child Health in Rural China: The Challenge of Creating Health Equity.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2022
    Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Yunting ZhangChild Health Advocacy Institute, National Children's Medical Center, Shanghai Children's Medical Center, affiliated to School of Medicine Shanghai Jiao Tong University.
Le KangChina Institute for Educational Finance Research, Peking University.
Jin ZhaoDepartment of Developmental and Behavioral Pediatrics, National Children's Medical Center, Shanghai Children's Medical Center, affiliated to School of Medicine Shanghai Jiao Tong University.
Prof Yingquan SongChina Institute for Educational Finance Research, Peking University.
Prof Fan JiangDepartment of Developmental and Behavioral Pediatrics, National Children's Medical Center, Shanghai Children's Medical Center, affiliated to School of Medicine Shanghai Jiao Tong University.
Chunling LuDivision of Global Health Equity, Brigham & Women's Hospital and Department of Global Health and Social Medicine, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA.
Shanghai Jiao Tong University · CNPeking University · CNBrigham and Women's Hospital · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAs a country with the second largest child population in the world, China has little population-level evidence on who has been left behind in early childhood development (ECD). Knowledge of inequalities in ECD will inform the Chinese government in policies on promoting ECD and guide global-level monitoring on ECD progress.

methodsUsing data from the first wave of ECD surveys conducted in China at the least-developed region, most-developed region, and a megacity (Shanghai) in 2017 and 2018, we measured population-level ECD with early Human Capability Index for a total of 63,559 children aged 36-59 months old. A child was classified as developmentally on track if his/her overall development score was above the 20

findingsChildren developmentally on track ranges from 71% (95% CI 70 to 72%) in the least-developed region, 82% (95% CI 81 to 83%) in the most-developed region, and 86% (95% CI 85 to 87%) in Shanghai. Significant unadjusted inequalities in ECD were observed in all five dimensions. After controlling for other socioeconomic factors, significant differences remained in three dimensions: those living in the poorest families, or with lower maternal schooling, or boys were less likely to be developmentally on track than their counterparts (lower by 10[95% CI 8 to 11]-15[95% CI 13 to 17], 7[95% CI 5 to 10]-10[95% CI 7 to 12], and 5[95% CI 4 to 6]-6[95% CI 5 to 8] percentage points respectively).

interpretationEfforts of reducing ECD inequalities in China shall focus primarily on reducing poverty and improving maternal education.

fundingNational Natural Science Foundation of China (81773443), Shanghai Committee of Science and Technology (2018SHZDZX05), Shanghai Municipal Health Commission (GWV-10.1-XK07; GDEK201708), Shanghai Education Committee, Chinese Social Science Foundation (BFA140046), Macao Tong Chai Charity Association, Beijing Sany Charitable Foundation, China Medical Board (#20-388), UNICEF, Faculty Grant of Brigham & Women's Hospital, Economic and Social Research Council [grant reference number ES/T003936/1'] as a UKRI Collective Fund Award "UKRI GCRF Harnessing the Power of Global Data to Support Young Children's Learning and Development Collaborative."

Indexed as

Chinaearly child developmentinequality

Identifiers

PMID34671753
PMCPMC8484893
OpenAlexW3184106504

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.