Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34671729›Full record

ArticleJAC-antimicrobial resistance2021

Community pharmacists' views on their current role and future opportunities for antibiotic stewardship: a French qualitative study.

Anaïs Essilini, Amélie Pierre, Aurélie Bocquier, Céline Pulcini, Christophe Wilcke, Julien Gravoulet, Béatrice Demore, Nathalie Thilly

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JAC-antimicrobial resistance, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
0.9field-weighted citation impact, top 25% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 16 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Review
  4. Bridging knowledge and practice: Antimicrobial Stewardship by community pharmacists in New Zealand.Antimicrobial stewardship & healthcare epidemiology : ASHE · 2026
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Anaïs EssiliniUniversité de Lorraine, APEMAC, F-54000 Nancy, France.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4123-7034
Amélie PierreUniversité de Lorraine, APEMAC, F-54000 Nancy, France.
Aurélie BocquierUniversité de Lorraine, APEMAC, F-54000 Nancy, France.
Céline PulciniUniversité de Lorraine, APEMAC, F-54000 Nancy, France.
Christophe WilckeUnion Régionale des Professionnels de Santé Pharmaciens du Grand Est, 4 rue Piroux, F-54000 Nancy, France.
Julien GravouletUnion Régionale des Professionnels de Santé Pharmaciens du Grand Est, 4 rue Piroux, F-54000 Nancy, France.
Béatrice DemoreUniversité de Lorraine, APEMAC, F-54000 Nancy, France.
Nathalie ThillyUniversité de Lorraine, APEMAC, F-54000 Nancy, France.
Interdisciplinarité en Santé Publique Interventions et Instruments de mesure complexes – Région Est · FR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundDifferent healthcare professionals should contribute to antibiotic stewardship (ABS) activities. Involvement of community pharmacists (CPs) has been little explored worldwide to date.

objectivesTo explore French CPs' views on ABS and antibiotic resistance, their role and current practices, and future opportunities for ABS.

methodsA qualitative study using semi-structured face-to-face individual interviews was performed from May to October 2019 among CPs from north-eastern France. Transcripts of the interviews were analysed using a thematic analysis.

resultsTwenty-seven interviews were conducted. Most participants had a clear understanding of antibiotic resistance and ABS. They considered themselves as 'guardians of the appropriate use of drugs' but often failed to fulfil this mission because of difficult relationships with physicians. Their current ABS practices are: (i) counselling patients about the antibiotic treatment; and (ii) reporting to the prescriber when they identify contraindications/drug interactions. Concerning their potential increased involvement in ABS, CPs felt they could perform more rapid diagnostic testing for sore throat; they were divided on the possibility for them to change the antibiotic prescription made by a physician and were mainly against the possibility of initiating an antibiotic prescription. The idea of systematically collecting unused antibiotics was perceived well by CPs, while unit dose delivery was not.

conclusionsFrench community pharmacists are willing to become more involved in ABS activities. Collaboration and trust between pharmacists and prescribers should however be improved.

Identifiers

PMID34671729
PMCPMC8521646
OpenAlexW3198548043

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.