Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34671727›Full record

ArticleBrain communications2021

Brain regions that support accurate speech production after damage to Broca's area.

Diego L Lorca-Puls, Andrea Gajardo-Vidal, PLORAS Team, Marion Oberhuber, Susan Prejawa, Thomas M H Hope, Alexander P Leff, David W Green, Cathy J Price

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Brain communications, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.8field-weighted citation impact, top 16% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 29 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Visualization of functional and effective connectivity underlying auditory descriptive naming.Clinical neurophysiology : official journal of the International Federation of Clinical Neurophysiology · 2025
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Diego L Lorca-PulsWellcome Centre for Human Neuroimaging, UCL Queen Square Institute of Neurology, London, UK.
Andrea Gajardo-VidalWellcome Centre for Human Neuroimaging, UCL Queen Square Institute of Neurology, London, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3946-0795
PLORAS Team
Marion OberhuberWellcome Centre for Human Neuroimaging, UCL Queen Square Institute of Neurology, London, UK.
Susan PrejawaDepartment of Neurology, Max Planck Institute for Human Cognitive and Brain Sciences, Leipzig, Germany.
Thomas M H HopeWellcome Centre for Human Neuroimaging, UCL Queen Square Institute of Neurology, London, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0714-8545
Alexander P LeffInstitute of Cognitive Neuroscience, University College London, London, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0831-3541
David W GreenDepartment of Experimental Psychology, University College London, London, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7152-1485
Cathy J PriceWellcome Centre for Human Neuroimaging, UCL Queen Square Institute of Neurology, London, UK.
Wellcome Centre for Human Neuroimaging · GBUniversity College London · GB

Funding

Medical Research Council MR/M023672/1Wellcome Trust 205103/Z/16/Z
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Broca's area in the posterior half of the left inferior frontal gyrus has traditionally been considered an important node in the speech production network. Nevertheless, recovery of speech production has been reported, to different degrees, within a few months of damage to Broca's area. Importantly, contemporary evidence suggests that, within Broca's area, its posterior part (i.e. pars opercularis) plays a more prominent role in speech production than its anterior part (i.e. pars triangularis). In this study, we therefore investigated the brain activation patterns that underlie accurate speech production following stroke damage to the opercular part of Broca's area. By combining functional MRI and 13 tasks that place varying demands on speech production, brain activation was compared in (i) seven patients of interest with damage to the opercular part of Broca's area; (ii) 55 neurologically intact controls; and (iii) 28 patient controls with left-hemisphere damage that spared Broca's area. When producing accurate overt speech responses, the patients with damage to the left pars opercularis activated a substantial portion of the normal bilaterally distributed system. Within this system, there was a lesion-site-dependent effect in a specific part of the right cerebellar Crus I where activation was significantly higher in the patients with damage to the left pars opercularis compared to both neurologically intact and patient controls. In addition, activation in the right pars opercularis was significantly higher in the patients with damage to the left pars opercularis relative to neurologically intact controls but not patient controls (after adjusting for differences in lesion size). By further examining how right Crus I and right pars opercularis responded across a range of conditions in the neurologically intact controls, we suggest that these regions play distinct roles in domain-general cognitive control. Finally, we show that enhanced activation in the right pars opercularis cannot be explained by release from an inhibitory relationship with the left pars opercularis (i.e. dis-inhibition) because right pars opercularis activation was positively related to left pars opercularis activation in neurologically intact controls. Our findings motivate and guide future studies to investigate (i) how exactly right Crus I and right pars opercularis support accurate speech production after damage to the opercular part of Broca's area and (ii) whether non-invasive neurostimulation to one or both of these regions boosts speech production recovery after damage to the opercular part of Broca's area.

Indexed as

aphasiaBroca’s areacerebellumspeech productionstroke

Identifiers

PMID34671727
PMCPMC8523882
OpenAlexW3204868259

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.