ArticleJournal of medical education and curricular development
A Systematic Scoping Review on Pedagogical Strategies of Interprofessional Communication for Physicians in Emergency Medicine.
Article in Journal of medical education and curricular development. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
17 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Interprofessional communication - a concept analysis inspired by Schwartz-Barcott and Kim´s hybrid model.BMC health services research · 2026Pooled it
- The use of Introduction, Situation, Background, Assessment, and Recommendation handover in the COVID-19 pandemic and non-COVID clinical settings: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Frontiers in health services · 2025Pooled it
- Divergent perceptions of the emergency consultation process between emergency physicians and consultants: a cross-sectional survey with latent class and dyadic risk analysis.BMC emergency medicine · 2026Article
- Applying collaborativist theory to reenvision small-group learning in emergency medicine education.AEM education and training · 2025Review
- Perceptions of Nurse-Surgeon Communication in the Operating Room: A Q-Methodology Study.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2025Article
- Caring for terminally Ill patients: the impact on oncologists.BMC palliative care · 2024Article
- Enhancing self-care education amongst medical students: a systematic scoping review.BMC medical education · 2024Article
- Article
- The role of patients' stories in medicine: a systematic scoping review.BMC palliative care · 2023Article
- Assessing the effects of a mentoring program on professional identity formation.BMC medical education · 2023Article
- Professional identity formation amongst peer-mentors in a research-based mentoring programme.BMC medical education · 2023Review
- Article
- Optimal care of people with brain cancer in the emergency department: A cross-sectional survey of outpatient perceptions.Asia-Pacific journal of oncology nursing · 2023Article
- Exploring the Critical Driving Forces and Strategy Adoption Paths of Professional Competency Development for Various Emergency Physicians Based on the Hybrid MCDM Approach.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Article
- Post graduate remediation programs in medicine: a scoping review.BMC medical education · 2022Article
- Effectiveness of a Mobile App in Reducing Therapeutic Turnaround Time and Facilitating Communication between Caregivers in a Pediatric Emergency Department: A Randomized Controlled Pilot Trial.Journal of personalized medicine · 2022Article
- Enhancing Professionalism Online (Netiquette) in Medical Schools: A Systematic Scoping Review.Journal of medical education and curricular developmentReview
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
14 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundInterprofessional communication (IPC) is integral to interprofessional teams working in the emergency medicine (EM) setting. Yet, the coronavirus disease 2019 pandemic has laid bare gaps in IPC knowledge, skills and attitudes. These experiences underscore the need to review how IPC is taught in EM. PURPOSE: A systematic scoping review is proposed to scrutinize accounts of IPC programs in EM.
methodsKrishna's Systematic Evidence-Based Approach (SEBA) is adopted to guide this systematic scoping review. Independent searches of ninedatabases (PubMed, Embase, CINAHL, Scopus, PsycINFO, ERIC, JSTOR, Google Scholar and OpenGrey) and "negotiated consensual validation" were used to identify articles published between January 1, 2000 and December 31, 2020. Three research teams reviewed the data using concurrent content and thematic analysis and independently summarized the included articles. The findings were scrutinized using SEBA's jigsaw perspective and funneling approach to provide a more holistic picture of the data.
resultsIN TOTAL: 18,809 titles and abstracts were identified after removal of duplicates, 76 full-text articles reviewed, and 19 full-text articles were analyzed. In total, four themes and categories were identified, namely: (a) indications and outcomes, (2) curriculum and assessment methods, (3) barriers, and (4) enablers.
conclusionIPC training in EM should be longitudinal, competency- and stage-based, underlining the need for effective oversight by the host organization. It also suggests a role for portfolios and the importance of continuing support for physicians in EM as they hone their IPC skills. HIGHLIGHTS: • IPC training in EM is competency-based and organized around stages.• IPC competencies build on prevailing knowledge and skills.• Longitudinal support and holistic oversight necessitates a central role for the host organization.• Longitudinal, robust, and adaptable assessment tools in the EM setting are necessary and may be supplemented by portfolio use.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.