Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34671692›Full record

ArticleIEEE internet of things journal2019

Automatic Knowledge Extraction to build Semantic Web of Things Applications.

Mahda Noura, Amelie Gyrard, Sebastian Heil, Martin Gaedke

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in IEEE internet of things journal, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Mahda NouraTechnische Universität Chemnitz, Germany.
Amelie GyrardKno.e.sis, Wright State University, USA.
Sebastian HeilTechnische Universität Chemnitz, Germany.
Martin GaedkeTechnische Universität Chemnitz, Germany.

Funding

SCH: kHealth: Semantic Multisensory Mobile Approach to Personalized Asthma CareR01HD087132 · NICHD · WRIGHT STATE UNIVERSITY · PI THIRUNARAYAN, KRISHNAPRASAD · 2016 to 2018
$939k
NICHD NIH HHS R01 HD087132
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The Internet of Things (IoT) primary objective is to make a hyper-connected world for various application domains. However, IoT suffers from a lack of interoperability leading to a substantial threat to the predicted economic value. Schema.org provides semantic interoperability to structure heterogeneous data on the Web. An extension of this vocabulary for the IoT domain (iot.schema.org) is an ongoing research effort to address semantic interoperability for the Web of Things (WoT). To design this vocabulary, a central challenge is to identify the main topics (concepts and properties) automatically from existing knowledge in IoT applications. We designed KE4WoT (Knowledge Extraction for the Web of Things) to automatically identify the most important topics from literature ontologies of 3 different IoT application domains - smart home, smart city and smart weather - based on our corpus consisting of 4500 full-text conference and journal articles to utilize domain-specific knowledge encoded within IoT publications. Despite the importance of automatically identifying the relevant topics for iot.schema.org, up to know there is no study dealing with this issue. To evaluate the extracted topics, we compare the descriptiveness of these topics for the 10 most popular ontologies in the 3 domains with empirical evaluations of 23 domain experts. The results illustrate that the identified main topics of IoT ontologies can be used to sufficiently describe existing ontologies as keywords.

Indexed as

Internet of Things (IoT)Knowledge ExtractionMachine Learning (ML)Natural Language Processing (NLP)OntologiesSemantic Web of Things (SWoT)Web of Things (WoT)

Identifiers

PMID34671692
PMCPMC8524393

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.