Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34671691›Full record

ArticleOrthopaedic journal of sports medicine2021

Application of Machine Learning Algorithms to Predict Clinically Meaningful Improvement After Arthroscopic Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction.

Kyle N Kunze, Evan M Polce, Anil S Ranawat, Per-Henrik Randsborg, Riley J Williams, Answorth A Allen, Benedict U Nwachukwu, HSS ACL Registry Group, Andrew Pearle, Beth S Stein and 18 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Orthopaedic journal of sports medicine, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 22 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
22citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
5.9field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

22 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 40 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

28 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Kyle N KunzeDivision of Sports Medicine, Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Hospital for Special Surgery, New York, New York, USA.
Evan M PolceUniversity of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health, Madison, Wisconsin, USA.
Anil S RanawatDivision of Sports Medicine, Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Hospital for Special Surgery, New York, New York, USA.
Per-Henrik RandsborgDivision of Sports Medicine, Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Hospital for Special Surgery, New York, New York, USA.
Riley J WilliamsDivision of Sports Medicine, Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Hospital for Special Surgery, New York, New York, USA.
Answorth A AllenDivision of Sports Medicine, Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Hospital for Special Surgery, New York, New York, USA.
Benedict U NwachukwuDivision of Sports Medicine, Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Hospital for Special Surgery, New York, New York, USA.
HSS ACL Registry Group
Andrew PearleDivision of Sports Medicine, Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Hospital for Special Surgery, New York, New York, USA.
Beth S SteinDivision of Sports Medicine, Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Hospital for Special Surgery, New York, New York, USA.
David DinesDivision of Sports Medicine, Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Hospital for Special Surgery, New York, New York, USA.
Anne KellyDivision of Sports Medicine, Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Hospital for Special Surgery, New York, New York, USA.
Bryan KellyDivision of Sports Medicine, Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Hospital for Special Surgery, New York, New York, USA.
Howard RoseDivision of Sports Medicine, Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Hospital for Special Surgery, New York, New York, USA.
Michael MaynardDivision of Sports Medicine, Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Hospital for Special Surgery, New York, New York, USA.
Sabrina StricklandDivision of Sports Medicine, Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Hospital for Special Surgery, New York, New York, USA.
Struan ColemanDivision of Sports Medicine, Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Hospital for Special Surgery, New York, New York, USA.
Jo HannafinDivision of Sports Medicine, Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Hospital for Special Surgery, New York, New York, USA.
John MacGillivrayDivision of Sports Medicine, Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Hospital for Special Surgery, New York, New York, USA.
Robert MarxDivision of Sports Medicine, Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Hospital for Special Surgery, New York, New York, USA.
Russell WarrenDivision of Sports Medicine, Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Hospital for Special Surgery, New York, New York, USA.
Scott RodeoDivision of Sports Medicine, Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Hospital for Special Surgery, New York, New York, USA.
Stephen FealyDivision of Sports Medicine, Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Hospital for Special Surgery, New York, New York, USA.
Stephen O'BrienDivision of Sports Medicine, Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Hospital for Special Surgery, New York, New York, USA.
Thomas WickiewiczDivision of Sports Medicine, Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Hospital for Special Surgery, New York, New York, USA.
Joshua S DinesDivision of Sports Medicine, Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Hospital for Special Surgery, New York, New York, USA.
Frank CordascoDivision of Sports Medicine, Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Hospital for Special Surgery, New York, New York, USA.
David AltcheckDivision of Sports Medicine, Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Hospital for Special Surgery, New York, New York, USA.
Hospital for Special Surgery · USUniversity of Wisconsin–Madison · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundUnderstanding specific risk profiles for each patient and their propensity to experience clinically meaningful improvement after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR) is important for preoperative patient counseling and management of expectations. PURPOSE: To develop machine learning algorithms to predict achievement of the minimal clinically important difference (MCID) on the International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC) score at a minimum 2-year follow-up after ACLR. STUDY

designCase-control study; Level of evidence, 3.

methodsAn ACLR registry of patients from 27 fellowship-trained sports medicine surgeons at a large academic institution was retrospectively analyzed. Thirty-six variables were tested for predictive value. The study population was randomly partitioned into training and independent testing sets using a 70:30 split. Six machine learning algorithms (stochastic gradient boosting, random forest, neural network, support vector machine, adaptive gradient boosting, and elastic-net penalized logistic regression [ENPLR]) were trained using 10-fold cross-validation 3 times and internally validated on the independent set of patients. Algorithm performance was assessed using discrimination, calibration, Brier score, and decision-curve analysis.

resultsA total of 442 patients, of whom 39 (8.8%) did not achieve the MCID, were included. The 5 most predictive features of achieving the MCID were body mass index ≤27.4, grade 0 medial collateral ligament examination (compared with other grades), intratunnel femoral tunnel fixation (compared with suspensory), no history of previous contralateral knee surgery, and achieving full knee extension preoperatively. The ENPLR algorithm had the best relative performance (C-statistic, 0.82; calibration intercept, 0.10; calibration slope, 1.15; Brier score, 0.068), demonstrating excellent predictive ability in the study's data set.

conclusionMachine learning, specifically the ENPLR algorithm, demonstrated good performance for predicting a patient's propensity to achieve the MCID for the IKDC score after ACLR based on preoperative and intraoperative factors. The femoral tunnel fixation method was the only significant intraoperative variable. Range of motion and medial collateral ligament integrity were found to be important physical examination parameters. Increased body mass index and prior contralateral surgery were also significantly predictive of outcome.

Indexed as

anterior cruciate ligamentartificial intelligenceclinically meaningfulIKDCMCIDreconstruction; machine learning

Identifiers

PMID34671691
PMCPMC8521431
OpenAlexW3207368480

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.