Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34671514›Full record

ReviewCureus2021

Efficacy of Probiotics as Prophylaxis for Urinary Tract Infections in Premenopausal Women: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Victor A Abdullatif, Roger L Sur, Eli Eshaghian, Kellie A Gaura, Benjamin Goldman, Pranav K Panchatsharam, Nathaniel J Williams, Joel E Abbott

Open access · diamondAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Cureus, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
2.6field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 24 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Victor A AbdullatifResearch, Western University of Health Sciences, Pomona, USA.
Roger L SurUrology, UC San Diego Health, San Diego, USA.
Eli EshaghianResearch, Western University of Health Sciences, Pomona, USA.
Kellie A GauraResearch, Western University of Health Sciences, Pomona, USA.
Benjamin GoldmanUrology, Ascension Macomb-Oakland Hospital, Warren, USA.
Pranav K PanchatsharamUrology, Ascension Macomb-Oakland Hospital, Warren, USA.
Nathaniel J WilliamsUrology, Ascension Macomb-Oakland Hospital, Warren, USA.
Joel E AbbottUrology, Pacific West Urology, Las Vegas, USA.
Pacific Clinical Research · USSt. John Macomb Oakland Hospital · USUC San Diego Health System · USWestern University of Health Sciences · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionAlthough antibiotic therapy has been the mainstay of prophylaxis and treatment of urinary tract infections (UTIs), antibacterial resistance has led to increased incidence of infections and healthcare spending in both community-acquired and nosocomial UTIs. This has led to an active exploration of alternative remedies for both the prophylaxis and treatment of UTIs, especially in women with recurrent urinary tract infections. Probiotic supplementation is one novel intervention that has been studied as a prophylactic measure in patients with UTIs. The current systematic review and meta-analysis was conducted to evaluate the efficacy of probiotics for prophylaxis in UTIs in premenopausal women.

methodsDetailed search strategies for each electronic database were developed for PubMed, EMBASE, and Scopus to identify relevant literature published between 2001-2021. RevMan 5.3 statistical software was used to analyze data in studies. The random-effects model was used for pooling the data. The risk of bias and study quality were assessed using Cochrane Collaboration's tool for assessing risk of bias in included studies. The scope of focus for this review was premenopausal adult women with a history of one or more UTI. The intervention consisted of a probiotic regimen for which the goal was to enhance the defensive microflora of the urogenital tract. Studies comparing a probiotic regimen to a placebo regimen were included. These studies' primary outcome was the proportion of women with at least one symptomatic bacterial UTI in each group (i.e., UTI recurrence rate) in the 12-month period following probiotic intervention. This study extends the work of researchers who systematically investigated the scientific literature on probiotics in the prevention of urinary tract infections with a particular focus on premenopausal women.

resultsAfter screening, three parallel-group randomized-controlled trials (RCTs) were included. We estimated the overall pooled data of these three studies with a total of 284 participants to have met the predefined inclusion criteria and were therefore included in this review. The results demonstrated that probiotics did not have a significant effect in the prophylaxis of UTIs. (Risk Ratio (RR): 0.59 confidence interval (CI): 0.26, 1.33), Heterogeneity: Chi² = 6.63, df = 2 (

Indexed as

lactobacilluspremenopausalprobioticsrecurrencerutisurinary tract infectionsuti prophylaxisutis

Identifiers

PMID34671514
PMCPMC8523083
OpenAlexW3205165027

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.