ArticleNature2021
Ethics of DNA research on human remains: five globally applicable guidelines.
Article in Nature, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 45 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
45 citing papers in PubMed.
- Ancient DNA and Human Physiology.Physiology (Bethesda, Md.) · 2026Review
- Ancient DNA as a temporal lens: reconstructing evolution, migration, and disease dynamics.Journal, genetic engineering & biotechnology · 2026Review
- Ancient genomics study reveals low HLA diversity in eastern hunter-gatherers.Genome biology · 2026Article
- Large-scale human genomic resources drive innovations toward forensic intelligent source attribution and precision identification.International journal of legal medicine · 2026Review
- Article
- The genetic legacy of the 17th-century colonial capital of St. Mary's City.Current biology : CB · 2026Article
- The Genomic Legacy of the Norman Conquest in Rural England.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026Article
- Genetic genealogy of the Piast dynasty and related European royal families.Nature communications · 2026Article
- Subsistence transition preceded population turnover in the eastern Colombian Andes.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026Article
- Ancient DNA studies performed in the forensic genetic laboratory in Slovenia: a narrative review.Croatian medical journal · 2026Review
- Review
- Article
- Detection ofVirulence · 2025Article
- A reanalysis of population dynamics in the Casas Grandes region of Northern Mexico using mitochondrial DNA.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2025Article
- Power and Limitations of Inferring Genetic Ancestry.Annals of human genetics · 2025Review
- Spatiotemporal reconstruction of Corded Ware and Bell Beaker burial rituals reveals complex dynamics divergent from steppe ancestry.Science advances · 2025Article
- Human, Animal, or Mineral? Ethical Considerations for Studies of Fossilized Hominin Remains.American journal of biological anthropology · 2025Article
- The outcasts, the sick, and the undead: atypical burials of the late medieval to modern greater Poland.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Neolithic introgression of IL23R-related protection against chronic inflammatory bowel diseases in modern Europeans.EBioMedicine · 2025Article
- Stable isotope evidence for pre-colonial maize agriculture and animal management in the Bolivian Amazon.Nature human behaviour · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
- Commented on by
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
64 authors.
Funding
Abstract
We are a group of archaeologists, anthropologists, curators and geneticists representing diverse global communities and 31 countries. All of us met in a virtual workshop dedicated to ethics in ancient DNA research held in November 2020. There was widespread agreement that globally applicable ethical guidelines are needed, but that recent recommendations grounded in discussion about research on human remains from North America are not always generalizable worldwide. Here we propose the following globally applicable guidelines, taking into consideration diverse contexts. These hold that: (1) researchers must ensure that all regulations were followed in the places where they work and from which the human remains derived; (2) researchers must prepare a detailed plan prior to beginning any study; (3) researchers must minimize damage to human remains; (4) researchers must ensure that data are made available following publication to allow critical re-examination of scientific findings; and (5) researchers must engage with other stakeholders from the beginning of a study and ensure respect and sensitivity to stakeholder perspectives. We commit to adhering to these guidelines and expect they will promote a high ethical standard in DNA research on human remains going forward.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.