ArticleNPJ digital medicine2021
Optimizing drug selection from a prescription trajectory of one patient.
Article in NPJ digital medicine, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed, 13 citations in OpenAlex.
- Adopting Mechanistic Molecular Biology Approaches in Exposome Research for Causal Understanding.Environmental science & technology · 2024Review
- A Genetic Analysis of Current Medication Use in the UK Biobank.Journal of personalized medicine · 2024Article
- Re: Prophylactic versus preemptive modified donor lymphocyte infusion for high-risk acute leukemia after allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation: a multicenter retrospective study.Bone marrow transplantation · 2024Article
- Precision medicine in complex diseases-Molecular subgrouping for improved prediction and treatment stratification.Journal of internal medicine · 2023Review
- Longitudinal models for the progression of disease portfolios in a nationwide chronic heart disease population.PloS one · 2023Article
- Genetic predictors of lifelong medication-use patterns in cardiometabolic diseases.Nature medicine · 2023Article
- Visualising disease trajectories from population-wide data.Frontiers in bioinformatics · 2023Article
- Matters Arising: Immortal time bias in the analysis of drug prescription trajectories.NPJ digital medicine · 2022Article
- Temporal patterns of multi-morbidity in 570157 ischemic heart disease patients: a nationwide cohort study.Cardiovascular diabetology · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
It is unknown how sequential drug patterns convey information on a patient's health status and treatment guidelines rarely account for this. Drug-agnostic longitudinal analyses of prescription trajectories in a population-wide setting are needed. In this cohort study, we used 24 years of data (1.1 billion prescriptions) from the Danish prescription registry to model the risk of sequentially redeeming a drug after another. Drug pairs were used to build multistep longitudinal prescription trajectories. These were subsequently used to stratify patients and calculate survival hazard ratios between the stratified groups. The similarity between prescription histories was used to determine individuals' best treatment option. Over the course of 122 million person-years of observation, we identified 9 million common prescription trajectories and demonstrated their predictive power using hypertension as a case. Among patients treated with agents acting on the renin-angiotensin system we identified four groups: patients prescribed angiotensin converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitor without change, angiotensin receptor blockers (ARBs) without change, ACE with posterior change to ARB, and ARB posteriorly changed to ACE. In an adjusted time-to-event analysis, individuals treated with ACE compared to those treated with ARB had lower survival probability (hazard ratio, 0.73 [95% CI, 0.64-0.82]; P < 1 × 10
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.