Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34671068›Full record

ArticleNPJ digital medicine2021

Optimizing drug selection from a prescription trajectory of one patient.

Alejandro Aguayo-Orozco, Amalie Dahl Haue, Isabella Friis Jørgensen, David Westergaard, Pope Lloyd Moseley, Laust Hvas Mortensen, Søren Brunak

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in NPJ digital medicine, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
1.7field-weighted citation impact, top 13% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 13 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Alejandro Aguayo-OrozcoNovo Nordisk Foundation Center for Protein Research, Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, University of Copenhagen, 2200, Copenhagen, Denmark.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1828-223X
Amalie Dahl HaueNovo Nordisk Foundation Center for Protein Research, Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, University of Copenhagen, 2200, Copenhagen, Denmark.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7656-7976
Isabella Friis JørgensenNovo Nordisk Foundation Center for Protein Research, Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, University of Copenhagen, 2200, Copenhagen, Denmark.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5694-4332
David WestergaardNovo Nordisk Foundation Center for Protein Research, Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, University of Copenhagen, 2200, Copenhagen, Denmark.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0128-8432
Pope Lloyd MoseleyNovo Nordisk Foundation Center for Protein Research, Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, University of Copenhagen, 2200, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Laust Hvas MortensenStatistics Denmark, 2100, Copenhagen, Denmark. lhm@dst.dk.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6399-495X
Søren BrunakNovo Nordisk Foundation Center for Protein Research, Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, University of Copenhagen, 2200, Copenhagen, Denmark. soren.brunak@cpr.ku.dk.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0316-5866
University of Copenhagen · DK

Funding

Medical Research Council MC_PC_17228Medical Research Council MC_QA137853Novo Nordisk Fonden (Novo Nordisk Foundation) NNF14CC0001Novo Nordisk Fonden (Novo Nordisk Foundation) NNF17OC0027594Novo Nordisk Fonden (Novo Nordisk Foundation) NNF18SA0034956
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

It is unknown how sequential drug patterns convey information on a patient's health status and treatment guidelines rarely account for this. Drug-agnostic longitudinal analyses of prescription trajectories in a population-wide setting are needed. In this cohort study, we used 24 years of data (1.1 billion prescriptions) from the Danish prescription registry to model the risk of sequentially redeeming a drug after another. Drug pairs were used to build multistep longitudinal prescription trajectories. These were subsequently used to stratify patients and calculate survival hazard ratios between the stratified groups. The similarity between prescription histories was used to determine individuals' best treatment option. Over the course of 122 million person-years of observation, we identified 9 million common prescription trajectories and demonstrated their predictive power using hypertension as a case. Among patients treated with agents acting on the renin-angiotensin system we identified four groups: patients prescribed angiotensin converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitor without change, angiotensin receptor blockers (ARBs) without change, ACE with posterior change to ARB, and ARB posteriorly changed to ACE. In an adjusted time-to-event analysis, individuals treated with ACE compared to those treated with ARB had lower survival probability (hazard ratio, 0.73 [95% CI, 0.64-0.82]; P < 1 × 10

Identifiers

PMID34671068
PMCPMC8528868
OpenAlexW3207000571

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.