ArticleScientific data2021
Updating the Chieti Affective Action Videos database with older adults.
Article in Scientific data, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed.
- State-dependent modulation of brain co-activation patterns induced by individually targeted VLPFC stimulation during viewing emotional film clips.Frontiers in human neuroscience · 2026Article
- The effects of prefrontal tDCS and hf-tRNS on the processing of positive and negative emotions evoked by video clips in first- and third-person.Scientific reports · 2024Article
- The effect of aging and emotions on time processing.Aging clinical and experimental research · 2023Article
- With or without the Mask: Age Differences in Perceived Trustworthiness and Health during the COVID-19 Pandemic.Behavioral sciences (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Article
- Review
- Automated Affective Computing Based on Bio-Signals Analysis and Deep Learning Approach.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Article
- Updating the Chieti Affective Action Videos database with older adults.Scientific data · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
- Comment on
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Validation of the Chieti Affective Action Videos (CAAV) database was replicated with a sample of older adults (age range 65-93). When designing experimental studies of emotions, it is crucial to take into consideration the differences in emotional processing between young and older adults. Therefore, the main goal of the present study was to provide an appropriate dataset for the use of CAAV in aging research. For this reason, the CAAV administration and the data collection methodology was faithfully replicated in a sample of 302 older adults. All the 360 standardized stimuli were evaluated on the emotional dimensions of valence and arousal. The CAAV validation in an older adults' population increases the potential use of this innovative tool. The present validation supports the use of the CAAV database in future experimental studies on cognitive functions in healthy and pathological aging.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.