Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34671046›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2021

Comparative evaluation of Nanopore polishing tools for microbial genome assembly and polishing strategies for downstream analysis.

Jin Young Lee, Minyoung Kong, Jinjoo Oh, JinSoo Lim, Sung Hee Chung, Jung-Min Kim, Jae-Seok Kim, Ki-Hwan Kim, Jae-Chan Yoo, Woori Kwak

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 58 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
58citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

58 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. High-risk lineages shape the resistome and virulome of multidrug-resistantFrontiers in cellular and infection microbiology · 2026
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Isolation and characterization ofFrontiers in microbiology · 2026
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Complete genome sequence ofMicrobiology resource announcements · 2025
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Jin Young LeeJCBio. Co., Ltd., Seoul, 05836, Korea.
Minyoung KongJCBio. Co., Ltd., Seoul, 05836, Korea.
Jinjoo OhJCBio. Co., Ltd., Seoul, 05836, Korea.
JinSoo LimDepartment of Agricultural Biotechnology and Research Institute of Agriculture and Life Sciences, Seoul National University, Seoul, 05836, Korea.
Sung Hee ChungDepartment of Laboratory Medicine, Kangdong Sacred Heart Hospital, Hallym University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.
Jung-Min KimDepartment of Laboratory Medicine, Kangdong Sacred Heart Hospital, Hallym University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.
Jae-Seok KimDepartment of Laboratory Medicine, Kangdong Sacred Heart Hospital, Hallym University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.
Ki-Hwan KimGencube Plus, Seoul, 08592, Korea.
Jae-Chan YooJCBio. Co., Ltd., Seoul, 05836, Korea. jc@jcbio.co.kr.
Woori KwakGencube Plus, Seoul, 08592, Korea. woori@hoonygen.com.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Assembling high-quality microbial genomes using only cost-effective Nanopore long-read systems such as Flongle is important to accelerate research on the microbial genome and the most critical point for this is the polishing process. In this study, we performed an evaluation based on BUSCO and Prokka gene prediction in terms of microbial genome assembly for eight state-of-the-art Nanopore polishing tools and combinations available. In the evaluation of individual tools, Homopolish, PEPPER, and Medaka demonstrated better results than others. In combination polishing, the second round Homopolish, and the PEPPER × medaka combination also showed better results than others. However, individual tools and combinations have specific limitations on usage and results. Depending on the target organism and the purpose of the downstream research, it is confirmed that there remain some difficulties in perfectly replacing the hybrid polishing carried out by the addition of a short-read. Nevertheless, through continuous improvement of the protein pores, related base-calling algorithms, and polishing tools based on improved error models, a high-quality microbial genome can be achieved using only Nanopore reads without the production of additional short-read data. The polishing strategy proposed in this study is expected to provide useful information for assembling the microbial genome using only Nanopore reads depending on the target microorganism and the purpose of the research.

Indexed as

AlgorithmsGenome, MicrobialGenomicsHigh-Throughput Nucleotide SequencingNanoporesNanopore SequencingSequence Analysis, DNA

Identifiers

PMID34671046
PMCPMC8528807

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.