Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34671028›Full record

ArticleNature communications2021

Bayesian log-normal deconvolution for enhanced in silico microdissection of bulk gene expression data.

Bárbara Andrade Barbosa, Saskia D van Asten, Ji Won Oh, Arantza Farina-Sarasqueta, Joanne Verheij, Frederike Dijk, Hanneke W M van Laarhoven, Bauke Ylstra, Juan J Garcia Vallejo, Mark A van de Wiel and 1 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nature communications, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 24 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
24citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

24 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Leveraging chromatin packing domains to target chemoevasion in vivo.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2025
    Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Bárbara Andrade BarbosaDepartment of Pathology, Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
Saskia D van AstenDepartment of Pathology, Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0001-6498-1176
Ji Won OhDepartment of Anatomy, School of Medicine, Kyungpook National University, Daegu, South Korea.ORCID 0000-0001-5742-5120
Arantza Farina-SarasquetaDepartment of Pathology, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
Joanne VerheijDepartment of Pathology, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
Frederike DijkDepartment of Pathology, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
Hanneke W M van LaarhovenDepartment of Medical Oncology, Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
Bauke YlstraDepartment of Pathology, Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0001-9479-3010
Juan J Garcia VallejoDepartment of Molecular Cell Biology & Immunology, Amsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam Infection and Immunity Institute, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
Mark A van de WielDepartment of Epidemiology and Data Science, Amsterdam Public Health research institute, Amsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands. mark.vdwiel@amsterdamumc.nl.ORCID 0000-0003-4780-8472
Yongsoo KimDepartment of Pathology, Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands. yo.kim@amsterdamumc.nl.ORCID 0000-0002-2995-2131

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Deconvolution of bulk gene expression profiles into the cellular components is pivotal to portraying tissue's complex cellular make-up, such as the tumor microenvironment. However, the inherently variable nature of gene expression requires a comprehensive statistical model and reliable prior knowledge of individual cell types that can be obtained from single-cell RNA sequencing. We introduce BLADE (Bayesian Log-normAl Deconvolution), a unified Bayesian framework to estimate both cellular composition and gene expression profiles for each cell type. Unlike previous comprehensive statistical approaches, BLADE can handle > 20 types of cells due to the efficient variational inference. Throughout an intensive evaluation with > 700 simulated and real datasets, BLADE demonstrated enhanced robustness against gene expression variability and better completeness than conventional methods, in particular, to reconstruct gene expression profiles of each cell type. In summary, BLADE is a powerful tool to unravel heterogeneous cellular activity in complex biological systems from standard bulk gene expression data.

Indexed as

Bayes TheoremComputer SimulationGene Expression ProfilingHumansLeukocytes, MononuclearMachine LearningModels, StatisticalNeoplasmsSequence Analysis, RNASingle-Cell AnalysisTranscriptomeWorkflow

Identifiers

PMID34671028
PMCPMC8528834

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.