Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34670774›Full record

ArticleBMJ open quality2021

Introduction of an enhanced recovery programme for total shoulder arthroplasty: report of a novel pathway.

Marie L Morgan, Gareth R Davies-Jones, Edward F Ibrahim, Simon J Booker, Marcus Bateman, Amol A Tambe, David I Clark

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ open quality, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
0.8field-weighted citation impact, top 26% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 13 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Marie L MorganDerby Shoulder Unit, University Hospitals of Derby and Burton NHS Foundation Trust, Derby, UK gareth.davies-jones@nhs.net marie.morgan2@nhs.net.
Gareth R Davies-JonesDerby Shoulder Unit, University Hospitals of Derby and Burton NHS Foundation Trust, Derby, UK gareth.davies-jones@nhs.net marie.morgan2@nhs.net.ORCID 0000-0002-5886-3250
Edward F IbrahimTrauma & Orthopaedics, Chelsea and Westminster Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK.
Simon J BookerTrauma & Orthopaedics, Sheffield Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Sheffield, UK.
Marcus BatemanDerby Shoulder Unit, University Hospitals of Derby and Burton NHS Foundation Trust, Derby, UK.
Amol A TambeDerby Shoulder Unit, University Hospitals of Derby and Burton NHS Foundation Trust, Derby, UK.
David I ClarkDerby Shoulder Unit, University Hospitals of Derby and Burton NHS Foundation Trust, Derby, UK.
University Hospitals of Derby and Burton NHS Foundation Trust · GBChelsea and Westminster Hospital NHS Foundation Trust · GBSheffield Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundEnhanced recovery (ER) programmes are well established in hip and knee arthroplasty, but are not yet commonplace for total shoulder arthroplasty (TSA). This study analyses the effect of implementing an ER programme with TSA, on length of stay (LOS), functional outcome and patient satisfaction. LOCAL PROBLEM: No established programme applying ER to the specifics of upper-limb arthroplasty existed at our unit.

methodsA three-cycle plan-do-study-act quality improvement methodology was applied, involving development of our multifactorial programme, a pilot phase and wider roll-out. A consecutive series of patients who underwent TSA and were enrolled in an ER programme were compared with a matched control group of consecutive patients who underwent TSA in the year before the programme started. For all patients, LOS as well as mean Oxford Shoulder Score (OSS) and Constant Score (CS) were quantified and patient satisfaction assessed.

interventionsA dedicated multidisciplinary team led preoperative class involving patient education, advice and occupational therapy assessment. A standardised perioperative anaesthetic regime based on regional anaesthetic techniques with preoperative analgesic and nutritional loading was introduced. Postoperative rehabilitation was also standardised with slings for comfort only and early safe-zone mobilisation. New patient information was developed.

results71 patients were included in matched cohorts. Mean LOS was reduced from 2.4 nights to 1.9 nights. The single night stay rate improved from 40% to 49%. Across the ER cohort, 15 less nights were required to complete same volume of surgeries as in the non-ER cohort.Parity in OSS and CS measured at 3 and 12 months after surgery were observed in both cohorts.Satisfaction was already high before ER but scores stayed the same or improved across all areas surveyed.Absolute complication rates of 9.9% in the non-ER group and 7% in the ER group were recorded.

conclusionOur ER programme benefited patients and the Trust by reducing time in hospital and improving patient satisfaction without an adverse effect on complication rate.

Indexed as

Arthroplasty, Replacement, KneeArthroplasty, Replacement, ShoulderCohort StudiesHumansLength of Stayefficiencyorganisationalpatient satisfactionquality improvementrehabilitationsurgery

Identifiers

PMID34670774
PMCPMC8529974
OpenAlexW3207379256

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.