Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34670767›Full record

ArticleBMJ open2021

Reliability and validity of a Spanish-language measure assessing clinical capacity to sustain Paediatric Early Warning Systems (PEWS) in resource-limited hospitals.

Asya Agulnik, Sara Malone, Maria Puerto-Torres, Alejandra Gonzalez-Ruiz, Yuvanesh Vedaraju, Huiqi Wang, Dylan Graetz, Kim Prewitt, Cesar Villegas, Adolfo Cardenas-Aguierre and 16 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ open, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed
5.2field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed, 21 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

26 authors at 6 institutions in 5 countries.

Asya AgulnikGlobal Pediatric Medicine, Saint Jude Children's Research Hospital, Memphis, Tennessee, USA asya.agulnik@stjude.org.ORCID 0000-0001-8932-8181
Sara MaloneCenter for Public Health Systems Science, Brown School, Washington University in Saint Louis, Saint Louis, Missouri, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-0361-8733
Maria Puerto-TorresGlobal Pediatric Medicine, Saint Jude Children's Research Hospital, Memphis, Tennessee, USA.
Alejandra Gonzalez-RuizGlobal Pediatric Medicine, Saint Jude Children's Research Hospital, Memphis, Tennessee, USA.
Yuvanesh VedarajuGlobal Pediatric Medicine, Saint Jude Children's Research Hospital, Memphis, Tennessee, USA.
Huiqi WangGlobal Pediatric Medicine, Saint Jude Children's Research Hospital, Memphis, Tennessee, USA.
Dylan GraetzGlobal Pediatric Medicine, Saint Jude Children's Research Hospital, Memphis, Tennessee, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-4541-6910
Kim PrewittCenter for Public Health Systems Science, Brown School, Washington University in Saint Louis, Saint Louis, Missouri, USA.
Cesar VillegasGlobal Pediatric Medicine, Saint Jude Children's Research Hospital, Memphis, Tennessee, USA.
Adolfo Cardenas-AguierreGlobal Pediatric Medicine, Saint Jude Children's Research Hospital, Memphis, Tennessee, USA.
Carlos AcunaPediatric Critical Care, Dr. Luis Calvo Mackenna Hospital, Santiago, Chile.
Ana Edith AranaOncology, Unidad Nacional de Oncología Pediátrica, Guatemala City, Guatemala.
Rosdali DíazPediatric Oncology, Instituto Nacional de Enfermedades Neoplásicas, Lima, Peru.
Silvana EspinozaPediatric Oncology, Hospital Infantil Teletón de Oncología, Queretaro, Mexico.
Karla GuerreroCasa de la Amistad, Mexico City, Mexico.
Angélica MartínezPediatric Oncology, Hospital General de Tijuana, Tijuana, Mexico.
Alejandra MendezPediatric Critical Care, Unidad Nacional de Oncologia Pediatrica, Guatemala City, Guatemala.
Erika MontalvoPediatric Critical Care, Hospital Oncológico Solca Núcleo de Quito, Quito, Ecuador.
Dora SoberanisOncology, Unidad Nacional de Oncología Pediátrica, Guatemala City, Guatemala.
Antonella TorelliPediatric Oncology, Dr. Luis Calvo Mackenna Hospital, Santiago, Chile.
Janeth QuelalPediatric Oncology, Hospital Oncológico Solca Núcleo de Quito, Quito, Ecuador.
Erika VillanuevaPediatric Oncology, Hospital Oncológico Solca Núcleo de Quito, Quito, Ecuador.
Meenakshi DevidasGlobal Pediatric Medicine, Saint Jude Children's Research Hospital, Memphis, Tennessee, USA.
Douglas LukeCenter for Public Health Systems Science, Brown School, Washington University in Saint Louis, Saint Louis, Missouri, USA.
Virginia McKayCenter for Public Health Systems Science, Brown School, Washington University in Saint Louis, Saint Louis, Missouri, USA.
EVAT Study Group
St. Jude Children's Research Hospital · USWashington University in St. Louis · USHospital Vozandes · ECHospital Luis Calvo Mackenna · CLInstituto Nacional de Enfermedades Neoplásicas · PEUniversidad de Tijuana · MX

Funding

Washington University Center for Diabetes Translation Research P30DK092950 · NIDDK · WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY · PI Ross C Brownson, Debra Haire-Joshu · 2011 to 2026
$11.7M
Washington University Implementation Science Center for Cancer Control (WU-ISCCC)P50CA244431 · NCI · WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY · PI COLDITZ, GRAHAM A. · 2019 to 2023
$8.0M
NCI NIH HHS P50 CA244431NIDDK NIH HHS P30 DK092950
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPaediatric Early Warning Systems (PEWSs) improve identification of deterioration, however, their sustainability has not been studied. Sustainability is critical to maximise impact of interventions like PEWS, particularly in low-resource settings. This study establishes the reliability and validity of a Spanish-language Clinical Sustainability Assessment Tool (CSAT) to assess clinical capacity to sustain interventions in resource-limited hospitals.

methodsParticipants included PEWS implementation leadership teams of 29 paediatric cancer centres in Latin America involved in a collaborative to implement PEWS. The CSAT, a sustainability assessment tool validated in high-resource settings, was translated into Spanish and distributed to participants as an anonymous electronic survey. Psychometric, confirmatory factor analysis (CFA), and multivariate analyses were preformed to assess reliability, structure and initial validity. Focus groups were conducted after participants reviewed CSAT reports to assess their interpretation and utility.

resultsThe CSAT survey achieved an 80% response rate (n=169) with a mean score of 4.4 (of 5; 3.8-4.8 among centres). The CSAT had good reliability with an average internal consistency of 0.77 (95% CI 0.71 to 0.81); and CFAs supported the seven-domain structure. CSAT results were associated with respondents' perceptions of the evidence for PEWS, its implementation and use in their centre, and their assessment of the hospital culture and implementation climate. The mean CSAT score was higher among respondents at centres with longer time using PEWS (p<0.001). Focus group participants noted the CSAT report helped assess their centre's clinical capacity to sustain PEWS and provided constructive feedback for improvement.

conclusionsWe present information supporting the reliability and validity of the CSAT tool, the first Spanish-language instrument to assess clinical capacity to sustain evidence-based interventions in hospitals of variable resource levels. This assessment demonstrates a high capacity to sustain PEWS in these resource-limited centres with improvement over time from PEWS implementation.

Indexed as

LanguageNeoplasmsChildHospitalsHumansReproducibility of Resultspaediatric intensive & critical carepaediatric oncologypaediatricsquality in health carestatistics & research methods

Identifiers

PMID34670767
PMCPMC8529978
OpenAlexW3207525512

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.