Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34670513›Full record

ArticleBMC cancer2021

Primary gross tumor volume is prognostic and suggests treatment in upper esophageal cancer.

Yuanmei Chen, Qiuyuan Huang, Junqiang Chen, Yu Lin, Xinyi Huang, Qifeng Wang, Yong Yang, Bijuan Chen, Yuling Ye, Binglin Zheng and 3 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC cancer, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors.

Yuanmei Chen *Department of Thoracic Surgery, Fujian Medical University Cancer Hospital, Fujian Cancer Hospital, Fuzhou, Fujian, China.
Qiuyuan Huang *Department of Radiation Oncology, Fujian Medical University Cancer Hospital, Fujian Cancer Hospital, No. 420, Fuma Road, Fuzhou, 350014, China.
Junqiang ChenDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Fujian Medical University Cancer Hospital, Fujian Cancer Hospital, No. 420, Fuma Road, Fuzhou, 350014, China. junqiangc@163.com.
Yu LinDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Fujian Medical University Cancer Hospital, Fujian Cancer Hospital, No. 420, Fuma Road, Fuzhou, 350014, China.
Xinyi HuangDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Fujian Medical University Cancer Hospital, Fujian Cancer Hospital, No. 420, Fuma Road, Fuzhou, 350014, China.
Qifeng WangDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Sichuan Cancer Hospital Institute, Sichuan Cancer Center, School of Medicine, University of Electronic Science and Technology of China, Chengdu, China.
Yong YangDepartment of Radiation Oncology, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China.
Bijuan ChenDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Fujian Medical University Cancer Hospital, Fujian Cancer Hospital, No. 420, Fuma Road, Fuzhou, 350014, China.
Yuling YeDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Fujian Medical University Cancer Hospital, Fujian Cancer Hospital, No. 420, Fuma Road, Fuzhou, 350014, China.
Binglin ZhengDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Fujian Medical University Cancer Hospital, Fujian Cancer Hospital, No. 420, Fuma Road, Fuzhou, 350014, China.
Rong QiDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Fujian Medical University Cancer Hospital, Fujian Cancer Hospital, No. 420, Fuma Road, Fuzhou, 350014, China.
Yushan ChenDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Fujian Medical University Cancer Hospital, Fujian Cancer Hospital, No. 420, Fuma Road, Fuzhou, 350014, China.
Yuanji XuDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Fujian Medical University Cancer Hospital, Fujian Cancer Hospital, No. 420, Fuma Road, Fuzhou, 350014, China. xuyuanji@fjmu.edu.cn.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundTo aid clinicians strategizing treatment for upper esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC), this retrospective study investigated associations between primary gross tumor volume (GTVp) and prognosis in patients given surgical resection, radiotherapy, or both resection and radiotherapy.

methodsThe population comprised 568 patients with upper ESCC given definitive treatment, including 238, 216, and 114 who underwent surgery, radiotherapy, or combined radiotherapy and surgery. GTVp as a continuous variable was entered into the multivariate Cox model using penalized splines (P-splines) to determine the optimal cutoff value. Propensity score matching (PSM) was used to adjust imbalanced characteristics among the treatment groups.

resultsP-spline regression revealed a dependence of patient outcomes on GTVp, with 30 cm

conclusionGTVp is prognostic for OS and PFS in upper ESCC. For patients with GTVp ≥30 cm

Indexed as

Tumor BurdenAdultAgedAged, 80 and overAntineoplastic AgentsCombined Modality TherapyEsophageal NeoplasmsEsophageal Squamous Cell CarcinomaEsophagitisFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedPostoperative ComplicationsPrognosisProgression-Free SurvivalAntineoplastic AgentsGTV-pPrognosisTreatmentUpper ESCC

Identifiers

PMID34670513
PMCPMC8529770

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.