ArticleBMC cancer2021
Disparity of perception of quality of life between head and neck cancer patients and caregivers.
Article in BMC cancer, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT07712120 (Integrating Clinical Psychology Into the Care of Patients With Head and Neck Cancer), which is not on this map. Cited by 12 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Integrating Clinical Psychology Into the Care of Patients With Head and Neck Cancer: A Pilot Randomized Controlled Trial
Who cites it
12 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 16 citations in OpenAlex.
- Caregiver burden, anxiety, and quality-of-life among informal caregivers of patient with head and neck cancer: a systematic review.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2026Pooled it
- Quality of life in survivors of pediatric medulloblastoma: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Child's nervous system : ChNS : official journal of the International Society for Pediatric Neurosurgery · 2023Pooled it
- Emotional meanings of clinical practice with head and neck cancer patients: a qualitative study with Brazilian professionals.Brazilian journal of otorhinolaryngology · 2026Article
- Comment on: "The use of generative artificial intelligence tools among individuals with cancer and their caregivers: a cross‑sectional study of awareness, attitudes, and experiences".Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2026Article
- Assessment of quality of life and associated factors among primary caregivers of cancer patients in Palestine: a cross-sectional study.BMC psychology · 2026Article
- Quality of life dynamics in the gastric cancer dyad: an actor-partner interdependence model analysis guiding the development of a family-centered nursing framework.Quality of life research : an international journal of quality of life aspects of treatment, care and rehabilitation · 2026Article
- Consent in Intensive Care: The Concurrence of Patients' and Families' Viewpoints. A Simulation StudyDeutsches Arzteblatt international · 2026Article
- Patient quality of life and caregiver experiences in ovarian cancer: How are they related?Quality of life research : an international journal of quality of life aspects of treatment, care and rehabilitation · 2023Article
- Perspectives on Emotional Care: A Qualitative Study with Cancer Patients, Carers, and Health Professionals.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Article
- Quality of Life in Caregivers of Cancer Patients: A Literature Review.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2023Review
- Caregiving burden, depression, and anxiety among family caregivers of patients with cancer: An investigation of patient and caregiver factors.Frontiers in psychology · 2023Article
- Understanding the Psychological Well-being of Patients With Locked-in Syndrome: A Scoping Review.Cureus · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundCaregivers are invaluable sources of support for individuals recovering from head and neck cancer (HNC). Accordingly, minimizing caregiver distress is essential to promote the well-being of both caregivers and their patients. This study assessed if psychosocial distress (i.e., anxiety and depression) among HNC caregivers is associated with a difference in how caregivers and their patients perceive patients' quality of life (QOL) after treatment completion.
methodsCaregivers' and patients' perceptions of patient QOL were assessed using the University of Washington QOL Questionaire (UWQOL), a validated HNC-specific health-related QOL questionnaire. The survey is interpreted in terms of its two composite scores: a physical QOL score and a social-emotional QOL score with higher scores indicating better QOL. Caregiver anxiety was assessed using the Generalized Anxiety Questionaire-7 (GAD-7) and caregiver depression was assessed using the Patient Health Questionaire 8 (PHQ-8). Patients completed the UWQOL as part of clinic intake while caregivers were asked to complete the UWQOL for their patients in addition to the PHQ-8 and GAD-7 in private. Linear regression was used to analyze the association between differences in caregivers' and patients' QOL scores (both social-emotional and physical QOL subscale scores) and GAD-7 and PHQ-8 scores.
resultsOf 47 caregivers recruited, 42.6% (n = 20) viewed patients' social-emotional QOL more negatively than patients themselves, while 31.9% viewed patients' physical QOL more negatively. After controlling for covariates, differences in perception of social-emotional QOL (p = .01) and differences in perception of physical QOL (p = .007) were significantly associated with caregiver depression, but not anxiety. Caregivers who disagreed with patients regarding patients' social-emotional QOL scored 6.80 points higher on the PHQ8 than agreeing caregivers. Caregivers who disagreed regarding patients' physical QOL scored 6.09 points higher.
conclusionCaregivers commonly view patients' QOL more negatively than patients themselves. These caregivers tend to have greater psychosocial distress than caregivers who agree with their patients. Interventions designed to identify and aid at-risk caregivers are critically needed. We propose screening for differences in perception of patient QOL as a way of identifying distressed caregivers as well as provider-facilitated communication between patients and caregivers as possible interventions that should be examined in future research.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.