Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34670507›Full record

ArticleBMC cancer2021

Disparity of perception of quality of life between head and neck cancer patients and caregivers.

Zachary M Kassir, Jinhong Li, Christine Harrison, Jonas T Johnson, Marci L Nilsen

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC cancer, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT07712120 (Integrating Clinical Psychology Into the Care of Patients With Head and Neck Cancer), which is not on this map. Cited by 12 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
4.5field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT07712120 narecruitingnot on this mapstarted 2025, after this paper: background citation

Integrating Clinical Psychology Into the Care of Patients With Head and Neck Cancer: A Pilot Randomized Controlled Trial

TypeinterventionalSponsorUniversity of Turin, ItalyRan2025 to 2027Enrolled58ConditionsHead and Neck Cancer, Surgery for Head and Neck Cancer Patients, Demolitive Surgical Procedures on the Oral Cavity or Oropharynx, With or Without Simultaneous Reconstruction Using FlapsArmsBrief clinical psychological intervention using biofeedback techniques
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 16 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Caregiver burden, anxiety, and quality-of-life among informal caregivers of patient with head and neck cancer: a systematic review.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2026
    Pooled it
  2. Quality of life in survivors of pediatric medulloblastoma: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Child's nervous system : ChNS : official journal of the International Society for Pediatric Neurosurgery · 2023
    Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Quality of life dynamics in the gastric cancer dyad: an actor-partner interdependence model analysis guiding the development of a family-centered nursing framework.Quality of life research : an international journal of quality of life aspects of treatment, care and rehabilitation · 2026
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Patient quality of life and caregiver experiences in ovarian cancer: How are they related?Quality of life research : an international journal of quality of life aspects of treatment, care and rehabilitation · 2023
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Quality of Life in Caregivers of Cancer Patients: A Literature Review.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2023
    Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Zachary M KassirDepartment of Otolaryngology, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Eye & Ear Institute, 203 Lothrop Street, Pittsburgh, PA, 15213, USA.
Jinhong LiDepartment of Biostatistics, University of Pittsburgh Graduate School of Public Health, 130 De Soto Street, Pittsburgh, PA, 15261, USA.
Christine HarrisonDepartment of Otolaryngology, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Eye & Ear Institute, 203 Lothrop Street, Pittsburgh, PA, 15213, USA.
Jonas T JohnsonDepartment of Otolaryngology, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Eye & Ear Institute, 203 Lothrop Street, Pittsburgh, PA, 15213, USA.
Marci L NilsenDepartment of Otolaryngology, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Eye & Ear Institute, 203 Lothrop Street, Pittsburgh, PA, 15213, USA. mlf981@pitt.edu.
University of Pittsburgh · USEye and Ear Foundation · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundCaregivers are invaluable sources of support for individuals recovering from head and neck cancer (HNC). Accordingly, minimizing caregiver distress is essential to promote the well-being of both caregivers and their patients. This study assessed if psychosocial distress (i.e., anxiety and depression) among HNC caregivers is associated with a difference in how caregivers and their patients perceive patients' quality of life (QOL) after treatment completion.

methodsCaregivers' and patients' perceptions of patient QOL were assessed using the University of Washington QOL Questionaire (UWQOL), a validated HNC-specific health-related QOL questionnaire. The survey is interpreted in terms of its two composite scores: a physical QOL score and a social-emotional QOL score with higher scores indicating better QOL. Caregiver anxiety was assessed using the Generalized Anxiety Questionaire-7 (GAD-7) and caregiver depression was assessed using the Patient Health Questionaire 8 (PHQ-8). Patients completed the UWQOL as part of clinic intake while caregivers were asked to complete the UWQOL for their patients in addition to the PHQ-8 and GAD-7 in private. Linear regression was used to analyze the association between differences in caregivers' and patients' QOL scores (both social-emotional and physical QOL subscale scores) and GAD-7 and PHQ-8 scores.

resultsOf 47 caregivers recruited, 42.6% (n = 20) viewed patients' social-emotional QOL more negatively than patients themselves, while 31.9% viewed patients' physical QOL more negatively. After controlling for covariates, differences in perception of social-emotional QOL (p = .01) and differences in perception of physical QOL (p = .007) were significantly associated with caregiver depression, but not anxiety. Caregivers who disagreed with patients regarding patients' social-emotional QOL scored 6.80 points higher on the PHQ8 than agreeing caregivers. Caregivers who disagreed regarding patients' physical QOL scored 6.09 points higher.

conclusionCaregivers commonly view patients' QOL more negatively than patients themselves. These caregivers tend to have greater psychosocial distress than caregivers who agree with their patients. Interventions designed to identify and aid at-risk caregivers are critically needed. We propose screening for differences in perception of patient QOL as a way of identifying distressed caregivers as well as provider-facilitated communication between patients and caregivers as possible interventions that should be examined in future research.

Indexed as

Psychological DistressAgedAnxietyCaregiver BurdenCaregiversCross-Sectional StudiesDepressionFemaleHead and Neck NeoplasmsHumansLinear ModelsMaleMiddle AgedPerceptionQuality of LifeSurveys and QuestionnairesCaregiverCaregiver burdenCaregiver distressHead and neckQuality of life

Identifiers

PMID34670507
PMCPMC8527693
OpenAlexW3158528057

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.