Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34670292›Full record

ArticleApplied clinical informatics2021

Before-Visit Questionnaire: A Tool to Augment Communication and Decrease Provider Documentation Burden in Pediatric Diabetes.

Yaa A Kumah-Crystal, Preston M Stein, Qingxia Chen, Christoph U Lehmann, Laurie L Novak, Sydney Roth, S Trent Rosenbloom

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Applied clinical informatics, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Measuring Documentation Burden in Healthcare.Journal of general internal medicine · 2024
    Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Yaa A Kumah-CrystalDepartment of Biomedical Informatics, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, Tennessee, United States.
Preston M SteinDepartment of Pediatrics, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee, United States.
Qingxia ChenDepartment of Biomedical Informatics, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, Tennessee, United States.
Christoph U LehmannClinical Informatics Center, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Texas, United States.
Laurie L NovakDepartment of Biomedical Informatics, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, Tennessee, United States.
Sydney RothCollege of Arts and Science, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, Tennessee, United States.
S Trent RosenbloomDepartment of Biomedical Informatics, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, Tennessee, United States.

Funding

Vanderbilt Biomedical Informatics Training ProgramT15LM007450 · NLM · VANDERBILT UNIVERSITY · PI Jessica S. Ancker, Bradley A. Malin · 2002 to 2026
$19.7M
NLM NIH HHS T15 LM007450T15LM007450-13 National Institutes of Health (NLM)VR14620.1 Vanderbilt Institute for Clinical and Translational Research
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo develop and evaluate an electronic tool that collects interval history and incorporates it into a provider summary note.

methodsA parent-facing online before-visit questionnaire (BVQ) collected information from parents and caregivers of pediatric diabetes patients prior to a clinic encounter. This information was related to interval history and perceived self-management barriers. The BVQ generated a summary note that providers could paste in their own documentation. Parents also completed postvisit experience questionnaires. We assessed the BVQs perceived usefulness to parents and providers and compared provider documentation content and length pre- and post-BVQ rollout. We interviewed providers regarding their experiences with the system-generated note.

resultsSeventy-three parents of diabetic children were recruited and completed the BVQ. A total of 79% of parents stated that the BVQ helped with visit preparation and 80% said it improved perceived quality of visits. All 16 participating providers reviewed BVQs prior to patient encounters and 100% considered the summary beneficial. Most providers (81%) desired summaries less than 1 week old. A total of 69% of providers preferred the prose version of the summary; however, 75% also viewed the bulleted version as preferable for provider review. Analysis of provider notes revealed that BVQs increased provider documentation of patients' adherence and barriers. We observed a 50% reduction in typing by providers to document interval histories. Providers not using summaries typed an average of 137 words (standard deviation [SD]: 74) to document interval history compared with 68 words [SD 47] typed with BVQ use. DISCUSSION: Providers and parents of children with diabetes appreciated the use of previsit, parent-completed BVQs that automatically produced provider documentation. Despite the BVQ redistributing work from providers to parents, its use was acceptable to both groups.

conclusionParent-completed questionnaires on the patient's behalf that generate provider documentation encourage communication between parents and providers regarding disease management and reduce provider workload.

Indexed as

Diabetes MellitusDocumentationChildCommunicationHumansParentsSurveys and Questionnaires

Identifiers

PMID34670292
PMCPMC8528566

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.