Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34669973›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of gynaecology and obstetrics: the official organ of the International Federation of Gynaecology and Obstetrics2022

Indirect impact of SARS-CoV-2 pandemic on pregnancy and childbirth outcomes: A nine-month long experience from a university center in Lombardy.

Sara Ornaghi, Simona Fumagalli, Chiara K Guinea Montalvo, Greta Beretta, Francesca Invernizzi, Antonella Nespoli, Patrizia Vergani

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of gynaecology and obstetrics: the official organ of the International Federation of Gynaecology and Obstetrics, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.5field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 18 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Intrapartum Quality of Care among Healthy Women: A Population-Based Cohort Study in an Italian Region.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2024
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Indirect impact of SARS-CoV-2 pandemic on pregnancy and childbirth outcomes: A nine-month long experience from a university center in Lombardy.International journal of gynaecology and obstetrics: the official organ of the International Federation of Gynaecology and Obstetrics · 2022
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Sara OrnaghiDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Unit of Obstetrics, MBBM Foundation Onlus at San Gerardo Hospital, Monza, Italy.
Simona FumagalliDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Unit of Obstetrics, MBBM Foundation Onlus at San Gerardo Hospital, Monza, Italy.
Chiara K Guinea MontalvoUniversity of Milan-Bicocca School of Medicine and Surgery, Monza, Italy.
Greta BerettaUniversity of Milan-Bicocca School of Medicine and Surgery, Monza, Italy.
Francesca InvernizziDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Unit of Obstetrics, MBBM Foundation Onlus at San Gerardo Hospital, Monza, Italy.
Antonella NespoliUniversity of Milan-Bicocca School of Medicine and Surgery, Monza, Italy.
Patrizia VerganiDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Unit of Obstetrics, MBBM Foundation Onlus at San Gerardo Hospital, Monza, Italy.
University of Milano-Bicocca · ITAzienda Ospedaliera San Gerardo · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo determine the impact on perinatal health of changes in social policies and obstetric care implemented to curb SARS-CoV-2 transmission. However, robust data on the topic are lacking since most of the studies has examined only the first few months of the outbreak.

methodsA retrospective analysis of prospectively collected data on uninfected and asymptomatically infected women giving birth between March and November 2020 and in the same time frame of 2019 at our tertiary care center in Lombardy, northern Italy. Perinatal outcomes were compared according to the year (2019 versus 2020) and to the trimester (March-May, June-August, September-November) of childbirth, corresponding to the three phases of the pandemic (first wave, deceleration, second wave) and covering a 9-month period.

resultsWe identified increased rates of gestational diabetes mellitus, spontaneous preterm birth, and neuraxial analgesia in 2020 versus 2019, with different temporal distributions: gestational diabetes mellitus and spontaneous preterm birth were more prevalent during the deceleration and the second wave phase, whereas epidural analgesia was more prevalent during the first wave.

conclusionBy assessing a prolonged time frame of the pandemic, we show that pandemic-related control measures, as applied in Lombardy, impacted relevant perinatal outcomes of women giving birth at our center.

Indexed as

COVID-19Pregnancy Complications, InfectiousPremature BirthFemaleHumansInfant, NewbornPandemicsParturitionPregnancyRetrospective StudiesSARS-CoV-2Universitiescarechildbirth, coronavirus disease 2019pandemicpregnancysevere acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2

Identifiers

PMID34669973
PMCPMC9087530
OpenAlexW3207685079

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.