ArticlePloS one2021
Politicization of COVID-19 health-protective behaviors in the United States: Longitudinal and cross-national evidence.
Article in PloS one, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 37 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
37 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Moral injury and mental health among health-care workers during the COVID-19 pandemic: meta-analysis.European journal of psychotraumatology · 2023Pooled it
- Social network exposures, political party affiliation, and perceived health risk.Social science & medicine (1982) · 2026Article
- The ecological framework of population health - Adding public trust as a forcing factor for U.S. life expectancy and COVID-19 mortality.Public health in practice (Oxford, England) · 2026Article
- Assessing factors of COVID-19 outcomes in the United States based on the ecological framework of population health.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Theodicy perspective as an effect of the interpenetration of mental and religious issues during the COVID-19 pandemic in Poland.PloS one · 2026Article
- COVID-19 and a Tale of Three Drugs: To Repurpose, or Not to Repurpose-That Was the Question.Viruses · 2025Review
- Analysis of the Political Viewpoint of Policy Statements From Professional Medical Organizations Using ChatGPT With GPT-4: Cross-Sectional Study.JMIR formative research · 2025Article
- 'Follow the science': Popular trust in scientific experts during the coronavirus pandemic.Public understanding of science (Bristol, England) · 2025Article
- Family protection motivation and economic vulnerability: a network analysis of public influenza risk perception, education and mitigation strategies in China.Frontiers in public health · 2025Article
- Balancing health and socioeconomic impacts: A uniform framework for evaluating non-pharmaceutical interventions.PloS one · 2025Article
- Social Media Authentication and Users' Assessments of Health Information: Random Assignment Survey Experiment.JMIR formative research · 2024Article
- "I just can't go back": Challenging Places for Older Americans since the COVID-19 Pandemic Onset.SSM. Qualitative research in health · 2024Article
- Digital Mass Hysteria during Pandemic? A Study of Twitter Communication Patterns in the US during the Stages of COVID-19 Vaccination.Behavioral sciences (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
- One size doesn't fit all: methodological reflections in conducting community-based behavioural science research to tailor COVID-19 vaccination initiatives for public health priority populations.BMC public health · 2024Article
- The Politicization of the COVID-19 Pandemic.Advances in experimental medicine and biology · 2024Review
- Lifetime prevalence of questionable health behaviors and their psychological roots: A preregistered nationally representative survey.PloS one · 2024Article
- Article
- Fight COVID Milwaukee protective behaviors and risk communications associated with the COVID-19 pandemic.Scientific reports · 2023Article
- People's political views, perceived social norms, and individualism shape their privacy concerns for and acceptance of pandemic control measures that use individual-level georeferenced data.International journal of health geographics · 2023Article
- Correlation between coronavirus conspiracism and antisemitism: a cross-sectional study in the United Kingdom.Scientific reports · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
- Erratum issued
Authors and funding
103 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
During the initial phase of the COVID-19 pandemic, U.S. conservative politicians and the media downplayed the risk of both contracting COVID-19 and the effectiveness of recommended health behaviors. Health behavior theories suggest perceived vulnerability to a health threat and perceived effectiveness of recommended health-protective behaviors determine motivation to follow recommendations. Accordingly, we predicted that-as a result of politicization of the pandemic-politically conservative Americans would be less likely to enact recommended health-protective behaviors. In two longitudinal studies of U.S. residents, political conservatism was inversely associated with perceived health risk and adoption of health-protective behaviors over time. The effects of political orientation on health-protective behaviors were mediated by perceived risk of infection, perceived severity of infection, and perceived effectiveness of the health-protective behaviors. In a global cross-national analysis, effects were stronger in the U.S. (N = 10,923) than in an international sample (total N = 51,986), highlighting the increased and overt politicization of health behaviors in the U.S.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.