Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34669708›Full record

ArticlePloS one2021

An improved deep learning model for hierarchical classification of protein families.

Pahalage Dhanushka Sandaruwan, Champi Thusangi Wannige

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Pahalage Dhanushka SandaruwanDepartment of Computer Science, University of Ruhuna, Matara, Sri Lanka.
Champi Thusangi WannigeDepartment of Computer Science, University of Ruhuna, Matara, Sri Lanka.ORCID 0000-0003-1659-3245

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Although genes carry information, proteins are the main role player in providing all the functionalities of a living organism. Massive amounts of different proteins involve in every function that occurs in a cell. These amino acid sequences can be hierarchically classified into a set of families and subfamilies depending on their evolutionary relatedness and similarities in their structure or function. Protein characterization to identify protein structure and function is done accurately using laboratory experiments. With the rapidly increasing huge amount of novel protein sequences, these experiments have become difficult to carry out since they are expensive, time-consuming, and laborious. Therefore, many computational classification methods are introduced to classify proteins and predict their functional properties. With the progress of the performance of the computational techniques, deep learning plays a key role in many areas. Novel deep learning models such as DeepFam, ProtCNN have been presented to classify proteins into their families recently. However, these deep learning models have been used to carry out the non-hierarchical classification of proteins. In this research, we propose a deep learning neural network model named DeepHiFam with high accuracy to classify proteins hierarchically into different levels simultaneously. The model achieved an accuracy of 98.38% for protein family classification and more than 80% accuracy for the classification of protein subfamilies and sub-subfamilies. Further, DeepHiFam performed well in the non-hierarchical classification of protein families and achieved an accuracy of 98.62% and 96.14% for the popular Pfam dataset and COG dataset respectively.

Indexed as

Computational BiologyDeep LearningHumansModels, GeneticProtein ConformationProteinsSequence Analysis, ProteinProteins

Identifiers

PMID34669708
PMCPMC8528337

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.