Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34669503›Full record

ArticleJournal of neurophysiology2021

Effect of background clutter on neural discrimination in the bat auditory midbrain.

Kathryne M Allen, Angeles Salles, Sangwook Park, Mounya Elhilali, Cynthia F Moss

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of neurophysiology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
3.3field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 11 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Kathryne M AllenDepartment of Psychological and Brain Sciences, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Maryland.ORCID 0000-0002-8548-3640
Angeles SallesDepartment of Psychological and Brain Sciences, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Maryland.ORCID 0000-0002-5726-4256
Sangwook ParkDepartment of Electrical and Computer Engineering, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Maryland.
Mounya ElhilaliDepartment of Electrical and Computer Engineering, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Maryland.ORCID 0000-0003-2597-738X
Cynthia F MossDepartment of Psychological and Brain Sciences, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Maryland.ORCID 0000-0001-6916-0000
Johns Hopkins University · US

Funding

Training Program in Hearing and BalanceT32DC000023 · NIDCD · JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY · PI CULLEN, KATHLEEN E · 1989 to 2025
$8.7M
Neural processing of communication sounds: acoustic features and semantic contentK99DC019145 · NIDCD · JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY · PI SALLES, ANGELES · 2021 to 2022
$125k
NIDCD NIH HHS K99 DC019145NIDCD NIH HHS T32 DC000023
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The discrimination of complex sounds is a fundamental function of the auditory system. This operation must be robust in the presence of noise and acoustic clutter. Echolocating bats are auditory specialists that discriminate sonar objects in acoustically complex environments. Bats produce brief signals, interrupted by periods of silence, rendering echo snapshots of sonar objects. Sonar object discrimination requires that bats process spatially and temporally overlapping echoes to make split-second decisions. The mechanisms that enable this discrimination are not well understood, particularly in complex environments. We explored the neural underpinnings of sonar object discrimination in the presence of acoustic scattering caused by physical clutter. We performed electrophysiological recordings in the inferior colliculus of awake big brown bats, to broadcasts of prerecorded echoes from physical objects. We acquired single unit responses to echoes and discovered a subpopulation of IC neurons that encode acoustic features that can be used to discriminate between sonar objects. We further investigated the effects of environmental clutter on this population's encoding of acoustic features. We discovered that the effect of background clutter on sonar object discrimination is highly variable and depends on object properties and target-clutter spatiotemporal separation. In many conditions, clutter impaired discrimination of sonar objects. However, in some instances clutter enhanced acoustic features of echo returns, enabling higher levels of discrimination. This finding suggests that environmental clutter may augment acoustic cues used for sonar target discrimination and provides further evidence in a growing body of literature that noise is not universally detrimental to sensory encoding.

Indexed as

AnimalsAuditory PerceptionChiropteraDiscrimination, PsychologicalEcholocationElectrophysiological PhenomenaInferior ColliculiNoiseauditory objectecholocationinferior colliculusnoisesonar object

Identifiers

PMID34669503
PMCPMC8794058
OpenAlexW3206074886

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.