Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34669223›Full record

ArticleConservation biology : the journal of the Society for Conservation Biology2022

Assessing the extinction risk of insular, understudied marine species.

Elin A Thomas, Monika Böhm, Caroline Pollock, Chong Chen, Mary Seddon, Julia D Sigwart

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Conservation biology : the journal of the Society for Conservation Biology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
3.6field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 25 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Assessing the extinction risk of insular, understudied marine species.Conservation biology : the journal of the Society for Conservation Biology · 2022
    Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 5 institutions in 5 countries.

Elin A ThomasQueen's University Marine Laboratory, Queen's University Belfast, Portaferry, UK.ORCID 0000-0003-3931-1001
Monika BöhmInstitute of Zoology, Zoological Society of London, London, UK.
Caroline PollockGlobal Species Programme, Red List Unit, International Union for Conservation of Nature (IUCN), Cambridge, UK.
Chong ChenX-STAR, Japan Agency for Marine-Earth Science and Technology (JAMSTEC), Yokosuka-city, Kanagawa, Japan.ORCID 0000-0002-5035-4021
Mary SeddonIUCN SSC Mollusc Specialist Group, Exbourne, Okehampton, UK.
Julia D SigwartQueen's University Marine Laboratory, Queen's University Belfast, Portaferry, UK.
Queen's University Belfast · GBInternational Union for Conservation of Nature (Bangladesh) · BDInternational Union for Conservation of Nature (United Kingdom) · GBJapan Agency for Marine-Earth Science and Technology · JPZoological Society of London · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Hydrothermal vents are rare deep-sea oases that house faunal assemblages with a similar density of life as coral reefs. Only approximately 600 of these hotspots are known worldwide, most only one-third of a football field in size. With advancing development of the deep-sea mining industry, there is an urgent need to protect these unique, insular ecosystems and their specialist endemic faunas. We applied the IUCN (International Union for the Conservation of Nature) Red List criteria to assess the extinction risk of vent-endemic molluscs with varying exposure to potential deep-sea mining. We assessed 31 species from three key areas under different regulatory frameworks in the Indian, West Pacific, and Southern Oceans. Three vent mollusc species were also examined as case studies of different threat contexts (protected or not from potential mining) to explore the interaction of local regulatory frameworks and IUCN Red List category assignment. We found that these assessments were robust even when there was some uncertainty in the total range of individual species, allowing assessment of species that have only recently been named and described. For vent-endemic species, regulatory changes to area-based management can have a greater impact on IUCN Red List assessment outcomes than incorporating additional data about species distributions. Our approach revealed the most useful IUCN Red List criteria for vent-endemic species: criteria B and D2. This approach, combining regulatory framework and distribution, has the potential to rapidly gauge assessment outcomes for species in insular systems worldwide.

Indexed as

Endangered SpeciesExtinction, BiologicalAnimalsConservation of Natural ResourcesEcosystemOceans and Seasdeep-sea miningEspecies amenazadashydrothermal ventsIUCNmarinemarinominería de mar profundomolluscsmoluscosrespiraderos hidrotermalesthreatened speciesUICN

Identifiers

PMID34669223
PMCPMC9299203
OpenAlexW3205757422

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.