Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34669186›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of gynaecology and obstetrics: the official organ of the International Federation of Gynaecology and Obstetrics2022

Antepartum stillbirth rates during the COVID-19 pandemic in Austria: A population-based study.

Dana A Muin, Sabrina Neururer, Veronica Falcone, Karin Windsperger, Hanns Helmer, Hermann Leitner, Herbert Kiss, Alex Farr

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of gynaecology and obstetrics: the official organ of the International Federation of Gynaecology and Obstetrics, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
2.8field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 20 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Antepartum stillbirth rates during the COVID-19 pandemic in Austria: A population-based study.International journal of gynaecology and obstetrics: the official organ of the International Federation of Gynaecology and Obstetrics · 2022
    Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Dana A MuinDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Division of Feto-maternal Medicine, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8981-4817
Sabrina NeururerDepartment of Clinical Epidemiology, Tyrolean Federal Institute for Integrated Care, Tirol Kliniken GmbH, Innsbruck, Austria.
Veronica FalconeDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Division of Feto-maternal Medicine, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.
Karin WindspergerDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Division of Feto-maternal Medicine, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.
Hanns HelmerDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Division of Feto-maternal Medicine, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.
Hermann LeitnerDepartment of Clinical Epidemiology, Tyrolean Federal Institute for Integrated Care, Tirol Kliniken GmbH, Innsbruck, Austria.
Herbert KissDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Division of Feto-maternal Medicine, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.
Alex FarrDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Division of Feto-maternal Medicine, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.
Medical University of Vienna · ATTirol Kliniken · AT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic caused by severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 has had dramatic effects on the pregnant population worldwide, increasing the risk of adverse perinatal outcomes.

objectiveTo assess the incidence of antepartum stillbirth (aSB) during the COVID-19 pandemic in Austria.

methodsWe collected epidemiological data from the Austrian Birth Registry and compared the rate of aSB (i.e., fetal death at or after 24

resultsIn total, 65 660 pregnancies were included, of which 171 resulted in aSB at 33.7 ± 4.8 gestational weeks. During the pandemic, the aSB rate increased from 2.49‰ to 2.60‰ (P = 0.601), in contrast to the significant decline in preterm deliveries at or before 37 gestational weeks from 0.61‰ to 0.56‰ (relative risk [RR] 0.93; 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.91-0.96; P < 0.001). During the first lockdown, the aSB rate significantly increased from 2.38‰ to 3.52‰ (P = 0.021), yielding an adjusted odds ratio of 1.57 (95% CI 1.08-2.27; P = 0.018). The event of aSB during the COVID-19 pandemic was strongly related with increased fetal weight and maternal obesity.

conclusionIn Austria, there has been an overall increase in the incidence of aSB during the pandemic with a significant peak during the first lockdown.

Indexed as

COVID-19Premature BirthAustriaCommunicable Disease ControlFemaleHumansInfant, NewbornPandemicsPregnancyPregnancy OutcomeSARS-CoV-2Stillbirthantepartum stillbirthcoronavirus disease 2019epidemiologyfetal deathperinatal mortality

Identifiers

PMID34669186
PMCPMC9087755
OpenAlexW3206567821

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.